Jump to content


Photo

lamedb or lamedb5 ?


  • Please log in to reply
40 replies to this topic

Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #21 ngc1927

  • Member
  • 17 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 14 November 2016 - 07:40

 

At the end I was right, the problem had been added in git from changes in ATSC :)

 
Little satisfaction my zgemma continues to show N/A :(
 
Now test to change last parameter in 0.
 
Thx athoik, you explained well.


Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #22 dax

  • Senior Member
  • 228 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 14 November 2016 - 09:05

I know in the past with some brands of decoders also N/A was displayed. Then after doing an automatic scan the N/A was gone. Maybe this is also the solution nowadays ? I cannot test it since my receivers don't have this problem.

It is not necessary an automatic scan, just tune the channel, n/a disappear and the channel name appear. It's enough an "automatic zap" (in my case).


Edited by dax, 14 November 2016 - 09:07.


Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #23 dax

  • Senior Member
  • 228 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 14 November 2016 - 09:06

Thx athoik, you explained well.

As usual!



Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #24 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,812 posts

+1,831
Excellent

Posted 15 November 2016 - 14:35

Right now there doesn't seem much point. i.e. if lamedb is in V5 format it reads it in fine at boot time,,, and then writes out in V4 at shutdown... crazy.

 

It is a feature under development. This is the downside of only having one "type" of image, so you have to bother users with WIP. We plan to address this when OpenPLi 5 is released.


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #25 dax

  • Senior Member
  • 228 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 20 November 2016 - 16:00

It is a feature under development. This is the downside of only having one "type" of image, so you have to bother users with WIP. We plan to address this when OpenPLi 5 is released.

So no solutions for now?



Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #26 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,812 posts

+1,831
Excellent

Posted 20 November 2016 - 16:18

Not my project, so I can't comment.


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #27 ngc1927

  • Member
  • 17 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 21 November 2016 - 06:22

 

It is a feature under development. This is the downside of only having one "type" of image, so you have to bother users with WIP. We plan to address this when OpenPLi 5 is released.

So no solutions for now?

 

 

Only solution I found is use git from 31-October ..for now last is unusable with N/A problem.

Waiting for solution.



Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #28 ngc1927

  • Member
  • 17 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 21 November 2016 - 21:12

Now work ok.

 

Thx.



Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #29 dax

  • Senior Member
  • 228 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 22 November 2016 - 09:21

Thanks! Will be merged also in master-next branch?



Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #30 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,747 posts

+167
Excellent

Posted 22 November 2016 - 09:38

All commits in master get merged into next-master.



Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #31 dax

  • Senior Member
  • 228 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 24 November 2016 - 09:30

All commits in master get merged into next-master.

Not merged yet?



Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #32 mrvica

  • Senior Member
  • 1,270 posts

+87
Good

Posted 24 November 2016 - 11:06

"lame" ? what a name for a services data base

did you know that "TWAIN" (scanner driver) is also an acronym (even a backronym) for

Technology Without An Interesting Name

 

 



Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #33 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,812 posts

+1,831
Excellent

Posted 24 November 2016 - 12:05

It is a "lame db", a database stored in a text file. So in this case, it sort of fits. ;)


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #34 dax

  • Senior Member
  • 228 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 27 November 2016 - 19:17

I have the pli master-next environment, can i 'merge' by myself?



Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #35 Moonwalker

  • Senior Member
  • 198 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 20 August 2018 - 23:21

I just noticed that after running iptv.sh script there is a lamebd5 file in etc/enigma2. Is this file necessary or can be deleted?



Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #36 Abu Baniaz

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 2,520 posts

+64
Good

Posted 21 August 2018 - 01:42

it is not needed. if you delete it, it will be recreated.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) using Forum Fiend v1.3.3.

Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #37 Moonwalker

  • Senior Member
  • 198 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 21 August 2018 - 10:04

Yes but can the box run with just one lamedb? On old boxes memory is limited and seeing that lamedb5 seems a copy of lamebd maybe there is a way to use only one file.



Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #38 Abu Baniaz

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 2,520 posts

+64
Good

Posted 21 August 2018 - 16:10

It is not needed, box will run without it. I don't know how to stop it's creation.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) using Forum Fiend v1.3.3.

Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #39 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,406 posts

+708
Excellent

Posted 21 August 2018 - 16:53

Settings (editors) switching to level 5 Will solve it... it seems nobody wants real improvements

Edited by littlesat, 21 August 2018 - 16:54.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #40 mrvica

  • Senior Member
  • 1,270 posts

+87
Good

Posted 21 August 2018 - 16:59

It is not needed, box will run without it. I don't know how to stop it's creation.


rm lamedb5
touch lamedb5
chattr +i lamedb5


2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users