Jump to content


Photo

New tuner Si2166D- Mut@nt 51HD


  • Please log in to reply
239 replies to this topic

Re: New tuner Si2166D- Mut@nt 51HD #101 twol

  • Senior Member
  • 448 posts

+15
Neutral

Posted 23 February 2018 - 12:24

Do you mean the old drivers would not work with S2X tuners? If so, you are probably right.
Or do you mean that the issue concerns S2X tuners only? If so, this is probably not the case.

No the old drivers probably will not support the s2x which came out later.
The lock issue is apparently on both tuner types.

Gigablue Quad 4K & UE 4K, Vu+Uno4KSE, DM900
.........FBC Tuners:
------------------> GT-SAT unicable lnb to 1.5M dish(28.2E)
------------------> Gigablue unicable lnb to 80 cm dish(19.2E)

Octagon sf8008, AX HD61, Edision Osmio 4K+, Zgemma H9Combo using Legacy ports on multiswitches
Zgemma H9twin & Zgemma H9 C/S mode into Giga4K
 


Re: New tuner Si2166D- Mut@nt 51HD #102 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,396 posts

+1,807
Excellent

Posted 23 February 2018 - 13:18

Are OpenPLi images available for HD51, dated October/November 2016?

 

Not with us, we only keep 6 months of images in backup, due to storage limitations.


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: New tuner Si2166D- Mut@nt 51HD #103 MCelliotG

  • Senior Member
  • 443 posts

+35
Good

Posted 23 February 2018 - 13:18

One major issue is that Enigma2 does not get the real time values from the tuners, and this happens also with the DVB-T2 tuner (CXD2837).

Attached File  hd51dvbt2.jpg   94.85KB   5 downloads

 

This is what the DVB-T2 tuner reports

Attached File  hd51tunervalues.jpg   138.9KB   7 downloads

As you can see everything is set to auto even when this info is set to be read from the tuner

 

In direct comparison, here's what shows on OSmini's Panasonic DVB-T2 tuner

Attached File  osminitunervalues.jpg   126.23KB   6 downloads

 

Now, OK two different tuners, two different drivers, but how much of a coincidence is it for both HD51 tuners to have faulty drivers? As far as I know Zgemma has the same issue, and can someone with a SF4008 report if the issue is there too?

I remember the initial images of OSmini had this problem as well, but was fixed.



Re: New tuner Si2166D- Mut@nt 51HD #104 twol

  • Senior Member
  • 448 posts

+15
Neutral

Posted 23 February 2018 - 15:15

I haven‘t heard of any lock issues with the SF4008.... and I am sure Huevos would have said if there is an issue.

Gigablue Quad 4K & UE 4K, Vu+Uno4KSE, DM900
.........FBC Tuners:
------------------> GT-SAT unicable lnb to 1.5M dish(28.2E)
------------------> Gigablue unicable lnb to 80 cm dish(19.2E)

Octagon sf8008, AX HD61, Edision Osmio 4K+, Zgemma H9Combo using Legacy ports on multiswitches
Zgemma H9twin & Zgemma H9 C/S mode into Giga4K
 


Re: New tuner Si2166D- Mut@nt 51HD #105 MCelliotG

  • Senior Member
  • 443 posts

+35
Good

Posted 23 February 2018 - 17:24

I don't refer to the lock issue, that's totally different. I talk specifically about the real time tuner values report. It does not work on HD51's internal tuners. Does Octagon report correctly?

Re: New tuner Si2166D- Mut@nt 51HD #106 MCelliotG

  • Senior Member
  • 443 posts

+35
Good

Posted 23 February 2018 - 17:24

I connected a usb tuner and it reports correctly btw. So is it only a driver issue?

Edited by MCelliotG, 23 February 2018 - 17:26.


Re: New tuner Si2166D- Mut@nt 51HD #107 Robinson

  • Senior Member
  • 2,621 posts

+30
Good

Posted 23 February 2018 - 17:56

As regards those "real-time" values, are you absolutely sure they are not simply copied from lamedb even though the setting is supposed to use tuner values?

Can you verify it?


ET9000, OpenPLi 4.0, 13E, 19E

HD51, OpenPLi 6.2, 75E - 30W


Re: New tuner Si2166D- Mut@nt 51HD #108 MCelliotG

  • Senior Member
  • 443 posts

+35
Good

Posted 23 February 2018 - 20:36

Absolutely sure. I deliberately perform many manual scans with modified parameters (i.e. wrong fec as silabs ignores that) and while settings value displays the wrong parameter (the lamedb entry), the tuner value will always return the tuned ones if the drivers or whatever elsee is supposed to supports it. Mutant has no support for their internal tuners as it seems.

Re: New tuner Si2166D- Mut@nt 51HD #109 Robinson

  • Senior Member
  • 2,621 posts

+30
Good

Posted 23 February 2018 - 21:14

OK, thanks.

Just a question regarding reporting of tuner values,

If you tune to an offset frequency, for example 10710 instead of 10719, does the tuner report correctly the strongest signal or does it stay at 10710?


ET9000, OpenPLi 4.0, 13E, 19E

HD51, OpenPLi 6.2, 75E - 30W


Re: New tuner Si2166D- Mut@nt 51HD #110 MCelliotG

  • Senior Member
  • 443 posts

+35
Good

Posted 24 February 2018 - 00:32

In OSmini (correct values report) it goes back to a center frequency (you see the tuner trying to update) but I don't know in what margin. If I tune +/- 5 it goes to the correct frequency, haven't tried a bigger gap. The SR, FEC etc are updated as they should. In HD51 you get the classic 10600 or 9750 whatever you enter. If the settings value is on you see the frequency you input!

Big, big tuner problems and I don't know how to report them to anyone that can fix them.


Edited by MCelliotG, 24 February 2018 - 00:33.


Re: New tuner Si2166D- Mut@nt 51HD #111 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,969 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 24 February 2018 - 10:04

If you tell it like this, it seems like actually a driver bug in some drivers?


* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: New tuner Si2166D- Mut@nt 51HD #112 MCelliotG

  • Senior Member
  • 443 posts

+35
Good

Posted 24 February 2018 - 22:07

But it is exactly that. Big problems in drivers. Just comparing how the very same tuner behaves in Dreamboxes, it's like a whole different tuner. Neither the values are rounded, the tuner reports all parameters correctly (except DVBS2X is returned as regular DVBS2 naturally) and not to mention native blindscan.
I don't know what the manufacturer does. All open images have these issues with Silabs. It's a pity cause it's an excellent tuner, perhaps the best ever to be in an Enigma2 receiver but support for it is very bad.

Re: New tuner Si2166D- Mut@nt 51HD #113 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,969 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 25 February 2018 - 09:27

Did you also check the VU+ Zero4k (which also comes with a Si2166 tuner)?


* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: New tuner Si2166D- Mut@nt 51HD #114 athoik

  • PLi® Core member
  • 8,458 posts

+327
Excellent

Posted 25 February 2018 - 10:51

The frequency is not updated.

It should be 11836 but remains 11832.

Attached Files


Wavefield T90: 0.8W - 1.9E - 4.8E - 13E - 16E - 19.2E - 23.5E - 26E - 33E - 39E - 42E - 45E on EMP Centauri DiseqC 16/1
Unamed: 13E Quattro - 9E Quattro on IKUSI MS-0916

Re: New tuner Si2166D- Mut@nt 51HD #115 MCelliotG

  • Senior Member
  • 443 posts

+35
Good

Posted 25 February 2018 - 14:05

Did you also check the VU+ Zero4k (which also comes with a Si2166 tuner)?

I don't own a zero 4k but as far as I've seen they have modified some stuff for their obsession with not supporting snr in db so that the tuners show only percentages. So I can't tell if the real time report works there at least!

Edited by MCelliotG, 25 February 2018 - 14:07.


Re: New tuner Si2166D- Mut@nt 51HD #116 Neo64

  • Senior Member
  • 51 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 28 February 2018 - 07:53

After the emergence of the new 2X tuner, all the images of Open Pli and all the other people who write about this decoder have a glitch that is definitely irritating when working with a motorized antenna.
When switching a channel from one satellite to another and moving the antenna, the signal appears after 20-30 seconds and after another 5-6 second picture.
 
With the image of Oren Pli of 10.12.2016, Mutant 51HD works perfectly with the tuner AVL, with All new images from 05.2017 to today the decoder has the commented problem, which for motorized users is more than annoying, the same problem with Open PLI  has the new ZGemma H7S. If Mutant have a Support Forum, please put a link to it to burn their tires, because the bug should come from their official images.
 
Thanks

Edited by Neo64, 28 February 2018 - 07:54.

Mutant 51HD 4K ;Octagon SF8008 4K;VUUno 4K SE; Formuler F1 ;Mutant 11 HD; IPlus- T20 /oficial "Movistar +/ ; HD200 Oficial Bulsatcom


Re: New tuner Si2166D- Mut@nt 51HD #117 Robinson

  • Senior Member
  • 2,621 posts

+30
Good

Posted 28 February 2018 - 12:37

We can therefore assume that the "rotor lock" bug was introduced when they updated their drivers in order to support S2X tuners.

This bug concerns both Mutant HD51, AX HD51 as well as Zgemma H7S models.

I guess they all use the same S2/S2X tuners and so the same tuner drivers.

So who is to blame? Mutant? AX? Zgemma? Silicon Labs?


ET9000, OpenPLi 4.0, 13E, 19E

HD51, OpenPLi 6.2, 75E - 30W


Re: New tuner Si2166D- Mut@nt 51HD #118 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 28 February 2018 - 12:58

Zgemma has always been a clone manufacturer, so my guess is Mutant.



Re: New tuner Si2166D- Mut@nt 51HD #119 Neo64

  • Senior Member
  • 51 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 28 February 2018 - 21:04

We can therefore assume that the "rotor lock" bug was introduced when they updated their drivers in order to support S2X tuners.

This bug concerns both Mutant HD51, AX HD51 as well as Zgemma H7S models.

I guess they all use the same S2/S2X tuners and so the same tuner drivers.

So who is to blame? Mutant? AX? Zgemma? Silicon Labs?

Guilt, of course only the manufacturer has it .

If the main drivers are the base of the Teams, they are going to be at fault. I've been in this puddle for a long time and always a manufacturer brings out a product in the market that needs to be sold and hands raised, bored of giving a touch of a thing, annoying and still bothering


Mutant 51HD 4K ;Octagon SF8008 4K;VUUno 4K SE; Formuler F1 ;Mutant 11 HD; IPlus- T20 /oficial "Movistar +/ ; HD200 Oficial Bulsatcom


Re: New tuner Si2166D- Mut@nt 51HD #120 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,396 posts

+1,807
Excellent

Posted 1 March 2018 - 21:42

Zgemma has always been a clone manufacturer, so my guess is Mutant.

 

Maybe in the early days, but none of the boxes supported by OpenPLi are clones! On the contrary, currently with the h9 they are ahead of all competition, with the new HiSil chipset.


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.



12 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 12 guests, 0 anonymous users