Jump to content


Photo

Multituner: First commits - but they need a lot of improvements


  • Please log in to reply
318 replies to this topic

Re: Multituner: First commits - but they need a lot of improvements #301 Abu Baniaz

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 840 posts

+21
Neutral

Posted 13 April 2019 - 23:37

Someone is having an issue with Vix and PLi. No problem with ATV.

I have the cable/terrestrial Sundtek which works fine.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) using Forum Fiend v1.3.3.

Re: Multituner: First commits - but they need a lot of improvements #302 dsayers2016

  • Member
  • 13 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 13 April 2019 - 23:52

I have been having tuning fatal error message when zapping on ViX but pressing OK twice zaps. 

 

Ive just flashed to PLI 7.0 using openmultiboot plugin but now Sundtek plugin showed no stick found so I went to update drivers and it showed current drivers date N/A so I updated drivers and rebooted box, once rebooted the plugin still shows no stick found but driver date 2019-04-02

 

Using Suntek DVB-S tuner on my VU+ Uno4K box


Edited by dsayers2016, 13 April 2019 - 23:53.


Re: Multituner: First commits - but they need a lot of improvements #303 dsayers2016

  • Member
  • 13 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 14 April 2019 - 01:43

Ok after switching back to Vix then PLI I have managed to get the tuner showing. Automatic scan doesn't work it finds no channels ABM scan finds them but I dont have the zapping issues maybe 2 seconds to zap. How do I enable debug logs in PLI? I looked in sytem but I cant find it.

 

For ViX I managed to get Automatic scan working by replacing NimManager.pyo and Satconfig.pyo from Vix 5.2.034 and 5.2.030 on 5.2.038 and it only finds 12 channels.



Re: Multituner: First commits - but they need a lot of improvements #304 dsayers2016

  • Member
  • 13 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 14 April 2019 - 12:02

Ok I have managed to get sundtek running on an openatv-6.3-vuuno4k-20190308_usb.zip Image as I wanted to test older and new drivers. For testing I haven't ran ABM

Attached File  OpenATV_Information.jpg   78.29KB   1 downloads

Driver date on install of sundtek tuner

Attached File  Drivers_Date.jpg   42.56KB   1 downloads

Automatic scan works with no zapping issues

Attached File  Automatic_scan.jpg   55.29KB   1 downloads

Updated drivers

Attached File  Drivers_2019.jpg   62.26KB   1 downloads

Automatic scan again no zapping issues 

Attached File  Automatic_scan_2019.jpg   58.15KB   1 downloads

The only difference I noticed is Automatic scan picked up more channels after driver update.



Re: Multituner: First commits - but they need a lot of improvements #305 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 47,967 posts

+501
Excellent

Posted 14 April 2019 - 12:12

with which openpli image?
How does the about screen looks? How does the tuner setup look. Does it report as combined or multi tuner? Maybe it reports as combined/hotswitchable tuner which it cannot do? (Then we need an exception for sundtek)

Edited by littlesat, 14 April 2019 - 12:16.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: Multituner: First commits - but they need a lot of improvements #306 dsayers2016

  • Member
  • 13 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 14 April 2019 - 12:36

I tried openpli-7.0-release-vuuno4k-20190408_usb

 

On OpenATV before I updated Sundtek driver I went to tuner config and it gave both as DVB-C and DVB-S/S2, after I updated Sundtek drivers it just shows as DVB-S/S2 but Sundtek did say essential core parts of the driver were updated for multi-tuner support

 

Ill boot back to PLI and grab a screen shot of the tuner info.


Edited by dsayers2016, 14 April 2019 - 12:38.


Re: Multituner: First commits - but they need a lot of improvements #307 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 47,967 posts

+501
Excellent

Posted 14 April 2019 - 12:36

In release we do not have the new code so that is not relevant for openpli...

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: Multituner: First commits - but they need a lot of improvements #308 dsayers2016

  • Member
  • 13 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 14 April 2019 - 12:48

About screen 

 

Attached File  Information.jpg   83.48KB   1 downloads

 

Sundtek Plugin

 

Attached File  Sundtek_Plugin.jpg   64.08KB   1 downloads

 

Tuner config

 

Attached File  Tuner+Info.jpg   44.24KB   1 downloads

 

Attached File  Tuner_Config.jpg   98.69KB   1 downloads

 

What I have noticed when going into tuner config on other images background picture is normally blank.



Re: Multituner: First commits - but they need a lot of improvements #309 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 47,967 posts

+501
Excellent

Posted 14 April 2019 - 12:59

Yes... at openpli as long the current service can be shown it will be shown... nothing related to your issue. Is this with 7.0 or with the new satconfig/Nimmanager regarding this thread. I see it registered as virtual tuner and you configured single lnb on 23.5 east. Is this really a single lnb???
No idea? What does dmesg indicate as soon you plugin the usb tuner?
Sundtek usually use not the kernel method for tuners which means somehow with these tuners you have some kind of work-a-round. I do not own such tuner so for my side I cannot troubleshoot.
But it sees the tuner so it should scan... and it should find channels... maybe difference in satellites.xml?

Edited by littlesat, 14 April 2019 - 13:01.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: Multituner: First commits - but they need a lot of improvements #310 dsayers2016

  • Member
  • 13 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 14 April 2019 - 13:14

With 7.0 or haven't you added the new satconfig/Nimmanger code to 7.0? 

 


I see it registered as virtual tuner and you configured single lnb on 23.5 east. Is this really a single lnb??? 

 

 

 

Its configured to 28.2 and only one LNB USB sat tuner my other tuner is an FBC Tuner using DVB-C

 


What does dmesg indicate as soon you plugin the usb tuner? 

 

 

 

Im not sure what you mean by dmesg 



Re: Multituner: First commits - but they need a lot of improvements #311 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 47,967 posts

+501
Excellent

Posted 14 April 2019 - 14:14

In release 7.0 we still have the older Nimmanager stuff dmesg is what you can do via the console to verify if the drivers etc are correctly connected... but it scans and find channels/services?

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: Multituner: First commits - but they need a lot of improvements #312 dsayers2016

  • Member
  • 13 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 14 April 2019 - 14:24

In release 7.0 we still have the older Nimmanager stuff dmesg is what you can do via the console to verify if the drivers etc are correctly connected... but it scans and find channels/services?

 

So none of your releases have the new code? I thought it thats why I switched to PLI with the new code on ViX I cant find any channels on Automatic scan but ABM scans fine but I get tune failed when zapping channels till I press OK twice to bring up second infobar.

 

Last night it didn't find any channels when doing Automatic but ive just tried again 12 channels found scan but ABM scan finds all and I dont have the zapping issues on PLI 7.0


Edited by dsayers2016, 14 April 2019 - 14:28.


Re: Multituner: First commits - but they need a lot of improvements #313 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 47,967 posts

+501
Excellent

Posted 14 April 2019 - 14:29

So only the scan is an issue?

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: Multituner: First commits - but they need a lot of improvements #314 dsayers2016

  • Member
  • 13 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 14 April 2019 - 14:33

So only the scan is an issue?

Im not sure it seems to be different issues for ViX and PLI 

 

So after doing Auto scan this is how my bouquets look 

 

Attached File  Entertainment.jpg   72.01KB   6 downloads

 

Re scan ABM and channels are fine.



Re: Multituner: First commits - but they need a lot of improvements #315 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 47,967 posts

+501
Excellent

Posted 14 April 2019 - 14:45

Can a dev please plit the sundtek dvb-s tuners issues from multituner thread?

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: Multituner: First commits - but they need a lot of improvements #316 dsayers2016

  • Member
  • 13 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 14 April 2019 - 15:12

Sorry I thought PLI 7.0 had the multituner commits as im having more issues with ViX scanning and zapping issues, feel free to delete my posts ill leave it to ViX to sort and use ATV till sorted. Thanks



Re: Multituner: First commits - but they need a lot of improvements #317 WanWizard

  • Forum Moderator
    PLi® Core member
  • 46,812 posts

+768
Excellent

Posted 14 April 2019 - 16:03

Release images are stable images, they never get intermediate updates, only fixes for serious bugs. We don't release develop images anymore.


Currently in use: VU+Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), Amiko Viper T2C (T2), SAB Alpha Triple HD (S2+T2), Zgemma H3.T2C (T/C), Zgemma H6 (fallback), VU+Zero (fallback)

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.

note: I do not provide support via PM !

 


Re: Multituner: First commits - but they need a lot of improvements #318 zeros

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 1,134 posts

+42
Good

Posted 14 April 2019 - 17:33

http://sundtek.com/media/
And the latest:
sundtek_installer_190402.110615.sh 38574.74 kb
DM920UHD DVB-S2X TRIPLE tuner + Triple M.S tuner DVB-S2X, DVB-T2/T, QboxHD, QboxHD Mini, Icecrypt T2300HD,
Qviart Lunix3 4K

Vertex 4K60 4:4:4 600MHz

Re: Multituner: First commits - but they need a lot of improvements #319 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 2,108 posts

+114
Excellent

Posted 14 April 2019 - 17:47

 

So only the scan is an issue?

Im not sure it seems to be different issues for ViX and PLI 

 

So after doing Auto scan this is how my bouquets look 

 

attachicon.gifEntertainment.jpg

 

Re scan ABM and channels are fine.

 

OpenViX is the new code.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users