Thanks - Octagon have only posted the usb flash
Any possible future support for Octagon SF8008?
Started by DS-1, 30 May 2019 11:02
123 replies to this topic
Re: Any possible future support for Octagon SF8008? #61
-
- Senior Member
- 448 posts
+15
Neutral
Posted 4 January 2020 - 13:17
Gigablue Quad 4K & UE 4K, Vu+Uno4KSE, DM900
.........FBC Tuners:
------------------> GT-SAT unicable lnb to 1.5M dish(28.2E)
------------------> Gigablue unicable lnb to 80 cm dish(19.2E)
Octagon sf8008, AX HD61, Edision Osmio 4K+, Zgemma H9Combo using Legacy ports on multiswitches
Zgemma H9twin & Zgemma H9 C/S mode into Giga4K
Re: Any possible future support for Octagon SF8008? #62
-
- PLi® Core member
- 70,786 posts
+1,830
Excellent
Posted 4 January 2020 - 14:25
Where?
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: Any possible future support for Octagon SF8008? #63
-
- Senior Member
- 65 posts
+3
Neutral
Re: Any possible future support for Octagon SF8008? #64
-
- Senior Member
- 93 posts
0
Neutral
Posted 5 January 2020 - 12:16
Current status is that there are 2 files. One for USB flashing and one for ofgwrite.
Hello Master, where can I get this image to test? Thanks
Re: Any possible future support for Octagon SF8008? #65
-
- Senior Member
- 1,297 posts
+41
Good
Posted 5 January 2020 - 12:19
There are develop images on some forum ,i think linuxsat support. Check it.
Sent from my HTC U11 using Tapatalk
Sent from my HTC U11 using Tapatalk
Army MoodBlue HD skin modification by me: https://github.com/T...-MoodBlueHD-mod
Matrix10 MH-HD2 skin modification by me: https://github.com/B...-MX-HD2-OpenPli
MetrixHD skin modification by me: https://github.com/T...xHD-WPstyle-mod
Slovenian translation for OpenPLi E2: https://github.com/T...ion-for-OpenPLi
Matrix10 MH-HD2 skin modification by me: https://github.com/B...-MX-HD2-OpenPli
MetrixHD skin modification by me: https://github.com/T...xHD-WPstyle-mod
Slovenian translation for OpenPLi E2: https://github.com/T...ion-for-OpenPLi
Re: Any possible future support for Octagon SF8008? #66
-
- PLi® Core member
- 7,185 posts
+323
Excellent
Posted 5 January 2020 - 12:43
Our image is not public available and it will stay private until we support the box.
Xtrend ET-9200, ET-8000, ET-10000, OpenPliPC on Ubuntu 12.04
Re: Any possible future support for Octagon SF8008? #67
-
- Senior Member
- 93 posts
0
Neutral
Posted 5 January 2020 - 12:56
Thanks,
I already tested the openpli-develop-sf8008-20200103_usb provided by Octagon.eu in your forum but as it does not have the possibility of installation in multiboot, just tested it a few hours on flasch, since a request that I make, as much as possible loved that this openpli image was supported For the Blurayplayer app as it has other teams like Openeight 6.7 and openatv6.3 / 4, besides tv box is also an excellent multimedia box, my request, thank you and good year.
Re: Any possible future support for Octagon SF8008? #68
-
- Senior Member
- 1,143 posts
+32
Good
Posted 5 January 2020 - 14:32
Our image is not public available and it will stay private until we support the box.
It's not "very private" when you can find it anywhere.....
I've spent no more than half a minute to find it.
Edited by jpuigs, 5 January 2020 - 14:34.
Enigma is getting old....
Spoiler
Re: Any possible future support for Octagon SF8008? #69
-
- PLi® Core member
- 70,786 posts
+1,830
Excellent
Posted 5 January 2020 - 14:35
We provided Octagon with a test image from my personal build server, and they promptly put that online, forcing me to change my setup as my slow DSL was overloaded with feed access from people flashing it...
You can understand Octagon has received a right bollocking because of that, I was rather pissed off... 
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: Any possible future support for Octagon SF8008? #70
-
- Senior Member
- 448 posts
+15
Neutral
Posted 5 January 2020 - 15:20
We provided Octagon with a test image from my personal build server, and they promptly put that online, forcing me to change my setup as my slow DSL was overloaded with feed access from people flashing it...
You can understand Octagon has received a right bollocking because of that, I was rather pissed off...
Good to hear that you pushed back, they drive me mad with their constant over-marketing
Gigablue Quad 4K & UE 4K, Vu+Uno4KSE, DM900
.........FBC Tuners:
------------------> GT-SAT unicable lnb to 1.5M dish(28.2E)
------------------> Gigablue unicable lnb to 80 cm dish(19.2E)
Octagon sf8008, AX HD61, Edision Osmio 4K+, Zgemma H9Combo using Legacy ports on multiswitches
Zgemma H9twin & Zgemma H9 C/S mode into Giga4K
Re: Any possible future support for Octagon SF8008? #71
-
- Senior Member
- 1,143 posts
+32
Good
Posted 5 January 2020 - 15:38
and they promptly put that online, forcing me to change my setup as my slow DSL was overloaded with feed access from people flashing it...
Didn't they know this situation, or they thought feeds where from OpenPli Servers ?
Enigma is getting old....
Spoiler
Re: Any possible future support for Octagon SF8008? #72
-
- Forum Moderator
PLi® Core member - 27,506 posts
+397
Excellent
Posted 5 January 2020 - 16:46
No they were aware that this was a home build. Some employee posted the file by mistake and immediately after I was informed regarding the available public testimage, I informed our contact and the file was removed instantly, but unfortunately the damage was already done.
Mijn schotel is een T90 met 10 LNB's. Daarnaast voor de fun nog een draaibaar systeem met een Triax TD 78.
Dreamboxen heb ik niet meer echt actief. Verder heb ik ook nog een een VU+ duo2 met 500Gb harddisk + een VU+ Uno, Zero, Solo 4K, Ultimo 4K, Zero 4K, Uno 4Kse. + ook nog een Xtrend ET7x00. Daarnaast heb ik ook nog diverse andere modellen w.o. een Formuler F4, ET8500, ET7500, Mut@nt 2400HD, Xsarius Fusion HD se en verder nog wel het e.e.a. waarmee op verzoek vanalles wordt getest. Iemand moet het tenslotte doen. 
Los van de eerder genoemde modellen heb ik nog wel een rits aan testsamples als Mut@nt 2400HD, HD60, GB UE4K, GB Trio4K, Maxitec Multibox combo en Twin, Octagon sf8008, sf8008 mini en last but nog least enkele modellen van het Grieks Duitse Edision.
Voor centrale opslag van media gebruik ik een Qnap 219P met tweemaal 2 Tb harddisks + een Synology DS414 met 12 Tb Totale opslag.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Many answers to your question can be found in our wiki: Just one click away from this "solutioncentre".
Als ik alles al wist hoefde ik ook niets te vragen. If I had all the knowledge I had no questions at all.
Re: Any possible future support for Octagon SF8008? #73
-
- PLi® Contributor
- 2,520 posts
+64
Good
Posted 5 January 2020 - 16:53
Sami Noor posted links to the Mediafire upload on other forums. Those posts are still present, he should ask forum moderators/admin to delete the posts.
The mediafire uploader can delete the file by himself.
Re: Any possible future support for Octagon SF8008? #74
-
- PLi® Core member
- 70,786 posts
+1,830
Excellent
Posted 5 January 2020 - 17:14
The image is already virtually useless, the URL the feeds pointed to no longer exists.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: Any possible future support for Octagon SF8008? #75
-
- Senior Member
- 1,143 posts
+32
Good
Posted 5 January 2020 - 18:20
Well done.
Enigma is getting old....
Spoiler
Re: Any possible future support for Octagon SF8008? #76
-
- Senior Member
- 37 posts
0
Neutral
Posted 10 January 2020 - 09:42
At what stage is the software work for octagon sf8008 4k? information please
SF8008 4 K
DM800 HD ,NEXT 18500 HD
Re: Any possible future support for Octagon SF8008? #77
-
- Senior Member
- 112 posts
+1
Neutral
Posted 10 January 2020 - 09:54
me too, please ? !!
Re: Any possible future support for Octagon SF8008? #78
-
- Forum Moderator
PLi® Core member - 27,506 posts
+397
Excellent
Posted 10 January 2020 - 10:02
At the moment the basic stuff of the sf8008 work ok but there is still some work in progress. Not only by us but also by Octagon and their developers.
One thing that still needs attention is the multiboot option which works ok on several alternative hardware. Octagon thinks different about the way multiboot should work. Depending the time solving the most important issues, which IMHO multiboot isn’t, there might be a separate RC for the sf8008 ‘soon’. And soon is very flexible. But don’t blame the messenger if it appears not to be so. There will be a public image if you notice it on our downloadpage.
Mijn schotel is een T90 met 10 LNB's. Daarnaast voor de fun nog een draaibaar systeem met een Triax TD 78.
Dreamboxen heb ik niet meer echt actief. Verder heb ik ook nog een een VU+ duo2 met 500Gb harddisk + een VU+ Uno, Zero, Solo 4K, Ultimo 4K, Zero 4K, Uno 4Kse. + ook nog een Xtrend ET7x00. Daarnaast heb ik ook nog diverse andere modellen w.o. een Formuler F4, ET8500, ET7500, Mut@nt 2400HD, Xsarius Fusion HD se en verder nog wel het e.e.a. waarmee op verzoek vanalles wordt getest. Iemand moet het tenslotte doen.
Los van de eerder genoemde modellen heb ik nog wel een rits aan testsamples als Mut@nt 2400HD, HD60, GB UE4K, GB Trio4K, Maxitec Multibox combo en Twin, Octagon sf8008, sf8008 mini en last but nog least enkele modellen van het Grieks Duitse Edision.
Voor centrale opslag van media gebruik ik een Qnap 219P met tweemaal 2 Tb harddisks + een Synology DS414 met 12 Tb Totale opslag.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Many answers to your question can be found in our wiki: Just one click away from this "solutioncentre".
Als ik alles al wist hoefde ik ook niets te vragen. If I had all the knowledge I had no questions at all.
Re: Any possible future support for Octagon SF8008? #79
-
- Senior Member
- 448 posts
+15
Neutral
Posted 10 January 2020 - 10:40
At the moment the basic stuff of the sf8008 work ok but there is still some work in progress. Not only by us but also by Octagon and their developers.
One thing that still needs attention is the multiboot option which works ok on several alternative hardware. Octagon thinks different about the way multiboot should work. Depending the time solving the most important issues, which IMHO multiboot isn’t, there might be a separate RC for the sf8008 ‘soon’. And soon is very flexible. But don’t blame the messenger if it appears not to be so. There will be a public image if you notice it on our downloadpage.
Thanks for the update - the politest words I can say about Octagon‘s current multiboot implementation on other images is that “it works - just about“ - with no thanks to Octagon! Considering all the effort they have put in to make other features work, they obviously consider multiboot to be way down on their list.
Gigablue Quad 4K & UE 4K, Vu+Uno4KSE, DM900
.........FBC Tuners:
------------------> GT-SAT unicable lnb to 1.5M dish(28.2E)
------------------> Gigablue unicable lnb to 80 cm dish(19.2E)
Octagon sf8008, AX HD61, Edision Osmio 4K+, Zgemma H9Combo using Legacy ports on multiswitches
Zgemma H9twin & Zgemma H9 C/S mode into Giga4K
Re: Any possible future support for Octagon SF8008? #80
-
- Member
- 8 posts
0
Neutral
Posted 10 January 2020 - 10:59
There is a high probability that in recording and timeshift modes will not work correctly.
16 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 16 guests, 0 anonymous users
