Jump to content


Photo

branch zeus


  • Please log in to reply
168 replies to this topic

Re: branch zeus #121 WTE

  • Senior Member
  • 821 posts

+36
Good

Posted 21 June 2020 - 18:53

I'm not adding Kodi to the image. I'm installing it from my feed after I run MACHINE=h7 bitbake openpli-enigma2-feed. Once I do that, image is not booting anymore. Very odd. Installing other packages like serviceapp and exteplayer from my feed is OK. 

Ok then I understand you wrong. So it must been check which packages are extra installed and if one or more packages cause the boot failer. So this "new" packages should been start by boot. So think easist way is to control if /etc/init.d is something added or changed and /etc/RC.x was is added. (Can check date and time of file)

I will check tomorrow a bit if I can see something strange.


Edited by WTE, 21 June 2020 - 18:54.

Mut@nt HD51 STB 4K

   :rolleyes:                :rolleyes:


Re: branch zeus #122 peti

  • Senior Member
  • 115 posts

+1
Neutral

Posted 21 June 2020 - 19:52

it even does not start to boot, no boot image, no signal on the spdif output. 


T90 | 28.2E-23.5E-19.2E-13E-9E-4.8E-0.8W-4W

Zgemma H7S | OpenPLI develop branch


Re: branch zeus #123 daimon

  • Senior Member
  • 220 posts

+5
Neutral

Posted 22 June 2020 - 06:15

Yes the problem exists on zgemma h7, with kodi in the first zeus builds
once you get around the rootfs problem the box
he left regularly,
 
in the latest builds there is something that prevents the box from starting
 
the box returns to function only by removing kodi


Re: branch zeus #124 peti

  • Senior Member
  • 115 posts

+1
Neutral

Posted 23 July 2020 - 07:53

just tried the latest head of dev branch, and my h7 is still not booting after Kodi is installed. any idea how to fix this issue?


Edited by peti, 23 July 2020 - 07:53.

T90 | 28.2E-23.5E-19.2E-13E-9E-4.8E-0.8W-4W

Zgemma H7S | OpenPLI develop branch


Re: branch zeus #125 A.A.

  • Senior Member
  • 391 posts

+8
Neutral

Posted 27 July 2020 - 14:28

@WTE

 

At least on vuduo2 you can have kodi built-in or install it later and no issues arise. No multiboot here.

 

About kodi, I think I'll open a new thread...

I am looking at the diffs with OE-A and there are some big ones with the patchset we have in OpenPli.

 

- different STB patchset

- strange FFMPEG handling (version check + patches)

- kodi startup script (moving HOME)

- different targets (v3d/vuplus) added by the recipe as 'platforms'

- pulseaudio in packageconfig

- replacement of external fmt with libfmt

 

Plus other small differences

 

My question is now, do this recipe run on other boxes?

On vuduo2 I get the Bus Error / SIGBUS but what bus?

 

Cheers

A.A.


Edited by A.A., 27 July 2020 - 14:30.


Re: branch zeus #126 foxbob

  • Senior Member
  • 624 posts

+18
Neutral

Posted 27 July 2020 - 15:02

I collected for duo2 and solo2 according to these recipes.It collects without errors,but the kodi does not start.There are no problems with 4K receivers,everything works.


Edited by foxbob, 27 July 2020 - 15:02.


Re: branch zeus #127 foxbob

  • Senior Member
  • 624 posts

+18
Neutral

Posted 17 August 2020 - 19:04

Again I put together for solo2 and duo2 codi18.8 and again codi does not start.There are no more thoughts.



Re: branch zeus #128 A.A.

  • Senior Member
  • 391 posts

+8
Neutral

Posted 19 August 2020 - 09:37

@foxbob

 

now that the temperatures are human I am again at it.

I fear there is some problematic piece in zeus  ()toolchain, python, dbus, ?) so I have built 7.3 and backported  kodi 18.8.

We can rule out the new GL headers, same error with older ones.

 

Unfortunately yesterday I got fetch errors...I fear github screwed again the commit hashes, will look at this today.

 

Cheers

A.A.



Re: branch zeus #129 A.A.

  • Senior Member
  • 391 posts

+8
Neutral

Posted 19 August 2020 - 22:20

about kodi fetch failure...my bad (perhaps): the phantom SRCREV was in reporefs.conf.

 

I am used to a pure oe-core setup as it was 10yrs ago....

 

I see there jsonschemabuilder-native as well and I am wondering about fetching specific subdirs for it and for texturepacker-native.

They share the same xbmc SRC_URI but with different revs.

 

Fixes for later, for now I'll try kodi on 7.3

 

A.A.



Re: branch zeus #130 A.A.

  • Senior Member
  • 391 posts

+8
Neutral

Posted 20 August 2020 - 14:18

Testing kodi 18.8 on release 7.3 was not productive, same "Bus Error"

 

With gdb I see it is also failing in the same place,  gitt/xbmc/platform/posix/main.cpp

 

  // Set up global SIGINT/SIGTERM handler
  struct sigaction signalHandler;
>  std::memset(&signalHandler, 0, sizeof(signalHandler));
  signalHandler.sa_handler = &XBMC_POSIX_HandleSignal;
  signalHandler.sa_flags = SA_RESTART;
  sigaction(SIGINT, &signalHandler, nullptr);
  sigaction(SIGTERM, &signalHandler, nullptr);

 

Unfortunately there is a bug in this sumo-OE so the debugfs does not contain the sources...

 

I think it is that memset but need much more time to follow the code flow line by line, too many shlibs are loaded!

I'll go back to develop/zeus for debugging.

 

Cheers

A.A.



Re: branch zeus #131 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,120 posts

+698
Excellent

Posted 20 August 2020 - 14:20

It should be tried on 8.0 now in development.... (Zeus)


Edited by littlesat, 20 August 2020 - 14:21.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: branch zeus #132 foxbob

  • Senior Member
  • 624 posts

+18
Neutral

Posted 20 August 2020 - 14:29

I collect on this thread.For any 4K receivers,there are no problems - kodi18,kodi19 going and running.But somehow for solo2 and duo2 there is a startup problem.Version kodi17.6 built and worked without problems.



Re: branch zeus #133 A.A.

  • Senior Member
  • 391 posts

+8
Neutral

Posted 20 August 2020 - 21:17

@littlesat

I have started with develop branch (zeus) but ifor vuduo2/mipsel t terminates with SIGBUS

So just for fun I wanted to see if the culprit was the toolchain or the different revisions of headers, python, etc.

Same result, SIGBUS

 

@foxbob

the recipe as it is in develop has a couple of flaws, first one is kernel defconfig, then the missing libxbmc_base.so in /usr/lib

 

In my github forks I am putting together the patches for zeus branch.

I was hoping to solve it earlier but there is still some little piece missing, must check again the OE-A differences.

 

I am now tempted to send pull request to have at least the current fixes merged.

Once solved this issue I'd like to refactor the recipe and split the BSP stuff in the respective layers.

 

Cheers

A.A.



Re: branch zeus #134 A.A.

  • Senior Member
  • 391 posts

+8
Neutral

Posted 20 August 2020 - 21:29

P.S.

@WTE, WanWizard

Pending commit is about introducing 'dvbproxy' in MACHINE_FEATURES.

I have tested these drivers for one month and they are rather stable.

 

Two questions in my mind:

1 - why did VU+ ship two set of drivers (vuplus-dvb-modules and vuplus-dvb-proxy)

2 - why didn't OpenPLi move to the new drivers like almost all other distros?

 

Regards

A.A.



Re: branch zeus #135 foxbob

  • Senior Member
  • 624 posts

+18
Neutral

Posted 20 August 2020 - 21:29

Here is a screenshot of the installation files.

Try my build.

https://drive.google...iew?usp=sharing

 

Attached Files



Re: branch zeus #136 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,396 posts

+1,807
Excellent

Posted 21 August 2020 - 07:33

2 - why didn't OpenPLi move to the new drivers like almost all other distros

 

We use the BSP as provided by VU+. If that doesn't contain the newest drivers, there are two possible options:

 

1. The drivers are beta drivers. A lot of vendors release those to OE-A so they can do the testing for them, and only after testing is the BSP updated

2. VU+ forgot to update the BSP, in which case they need some kickin'...


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: branch zeus #137 A.A.

  • Senior Member
  • 391 posts

+8
Neutral

Posted 22 August 2020 - 10:10

Using valgrind I got this

 

https://pastebin.com/D4GxFdH6

 

But in do_configure

 Found EGL: /tmp/build/tmp/work/vuduo2-oe-linux/kodi/1_18.8+gitrAUTOINC+0e37911544-r0/recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libEGL.so

and in fact it is there...

 

Note that I started kodi-stb  without args

 

Investigating..

 

A.A.



Re: branch zeus #138 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,969 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 28 August 2020 - 16:30

Shouldn't this thread be better called something like "Kodi on Zeus and newer"?


* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: branch zeus #139 A.A.

  • Senior Member
  • 391 posts

+8
Neutral

Posted 4 September 2020 - 13:48

Yeah, but this could be good news...no other software has such issues on mipsel in develop branch (SIGBUS).

 

I am now ending up with the conclusion that the binary is probably miscompiled/badly linked and one OE-A commit hints at this [1]

 

But it is not only this: some kodi dependencies in /recipes-support (fmt, libnfs, flatbuffers) are different/are patched  in OE-A which is known as 'working example'.

So I am following this and also adapting 'our' recipe adding the packageconfig bits and the block of DISABLE_INTERNAL options (and more). I just need to add pulseadio now.

 

Recently I found an interesting fork of meta-kodi with a supposed 'fix' for kodi [2] which makes me doubt of fmt. Note that in this fork the 'multilib/fixes' of 'captain' are ignored by the upgrades...

Ah, upgrading to fmt > 4.0 makes the kodi builddir over 13GB...doh! Something was ignored? Something is double?

 

This period is for me very busy but I plan to continue testings on weekend, hoping that someone jumps in to help.

 

Cheers

A.A.

 

[1] https://github.com/o...3af707386e3cad2

[2] https://github.com/d...ae4483ac39678a1



Re: branch zeus #140 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,969 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 11 September 2020 - 12:50

Indeed, a sigbus very much suggests wrong compilation options (sub-arch).


* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.



11 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 11 guests, 0 anonymous users