Jump to content


Photo

OpenPLi-py3


  • Please log in to reply
1139 replies to this topic

Re: OpenPLi-py3 #501 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,621 posts

+161
Excellent

Posted 20 August 2022 - 18:59

@Littlesat,

 

This is causing the difference: https://github.com/O...aebbe93086e2938

 

I'm not sure what @athoik intended to do here...

Why would you use the name on a sort by date?

 

Ours looks like this: https://github.com/O...38a72db6fc2e836



Re: OpenPLi-py3 #502 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,216 posts

+1,798
Excellent

Posted 21 August 2022 - 13:29

The point is that sub directories shouild never be sorted on date, only the files.

 

Currently, when you sort the files by date (or by reverse date), the sub directories are displayed in a random order.

 

See the difference in the screenshots in https://forums.openp...25#entry1475016


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: OpenPLi-py3 #503 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,621 posts

+161
Excellent

Posted 21 August 2022 - 18:32

Yes the sub folders should be sorted by date.

 

You are just used to the wrong behaviour.

 

The most recently written folder should be first. This is not a name sort.


Edited by Huevos, 21 August 2022 - 18:41.


Re: OpenPLi-py3 #504 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,216 posts

+1,798
Excellent

Posted 21 August 2022 - 19:41

No, I disagree, this is an unbelievably stupid order.

 

Please explain in what situation is this a logical order of folders?

Attached Files


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: OpenPLi-py3 #505 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,621 posts

+161
Excellent

Posted 21 August 2022 - 20:04

There is already an alpha sort.



Re: OpenPLi-py3 #506 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,216 posts

+1,798
Excellent

Posted 21 August 2022 - 20:25

Yes, but that also sorts the recordings alphabetical, which in case of a series means the same as "random", as all names are the same.

 

Due to this change, I have to suffix all my recordings with a series and episode number, to make sure they are sorted properly. A massive waste of time without any benefit whatsoever.


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: OpenPLi-py3 #507 geisivi

  • Member
  • 16 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 21 August 2022 - 20:52

Attached File  enigma2_crash.log   26.62KB   3 downloadsXstreamity plugin doesn't work on vu+uno 4k. OpenPli py3 lasts versions.

 

Tried with 3.69 version from feeds.

Also with 3.70 and 3.71.

 

Always crash whwn try to open list.

 

I've tried with openatv 7.1 (py 3) and all versoons works ok.


Edited by geisivi, 21 August 2022 - 20:54.


Re: OpenPLi-py3 #508 geisivi

  • Member
  • 16 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 21 August 2022 - 20:55

crash log

 

Attached File  enigma2_crash.log   26.62KB   3 downloads



Re: OpenPLi-py3 #509 rantanplan

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 1,857 posts

+87
Good

Posted 21 August 2022 - 23:00

ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'PIL'

The error can only have been caused by a third-party version.
Version from Feed build with
 

RDEPENDS_${PN} = "${PYTHON_PN} ${PYTHON_PN}-multiprocessing ${PYTHON_PN}-requests \
                  ${PYTHON_PN}-imaging ${PYTHON_PN}-pillow \
"

The Error missing module "PIL" meens missng python3-pillow.
So if you installed from feed then Python3-pillow will be installed automatically.
 



Re: OpenPLi-py3 #510 johnny0705

  • Senior Member
  • 246 posts

+2
Neutral

Posted 22 August 2022 - 07:20

The point is that sub directories shouild never be sorted on date, only the files.

Currently, when you sort the files by date (or by reverse date), the sub directories are displayed in a random order.

See the difference in the screenshots in https://forums.openp...25#entry1475016


I agree, that is the sort method in all other versions of OpenPli, and I hope this will be changed.

Edited by johnny0705, 22 August 2022 - 07:27.

Gr. Jan

VU-Ultimo 4K + Zgemma 7H + ET10000 OpenPli 9


Re: OpenPLi-py3 #511 johnny0705

  • Senior Member
  • 246 posts

+2
Neutral

Posted 22 August 2022 - 07:25

See above

Edited by johnny0705, 22 August 2022 - 07:28.

Gr. Jan

VU-Ultimo 4K + Zgemma 7H + ET10000 OpenPli 9


Re: OpenPLi-py3 #512 Beeker

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 1,602 posts

+203
Excellent

Posted 22 August 2022 - 09:43

With the patch from @Huevos the subdirs are sorted by date and not random.

When files are sorted by date, sub dirs should be sorted by date as well.

That is how file browsers work.

Otherwise there will be no option to sort subdirs by date at all either.

 

Or must be expand the options with:

-Sort files by date and subdirs alphabetical.

-Sort files and subdirs by date.

?


Edited by Beeker, 22 August 2022 - 09:44.

Dreambox dm920, Uclan Ustym4Kpro, Gigablue UHD TRIO 4K and Dreambox dm8000. Wavefrontier T55 13.0|19.2|23.5|28.2 + Ziggo.


Re: OpenPLi-py3 #513 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,621 posts

+161
Excellent

Posted 22 August 2022 - 10:23

With the patch from @Huevos the subdirs are sorted by date and not random.

When files are sorted by date, sub dirs should be sorted by date as well.

That is how file browsers work.

Otherwise there will be no option to sort subdirs by date at all either.

 

Or must be expand the options with:

-Sort files by date and subdirs alphabetical.

-Sort files and subdirs by date.

?

+1

 

I think you've done a better job of explaining than me. Thanks.



Re: OpenPLi-py3 #514 geisivi

  • Member
  • 16 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 22 August 2022 - 10:39

 

The point is that sub directories shouild never be sorted on date, only the files.

Currently, when you sort the files by date (or by reverse date), the sub directories are displayed in a random order.

See the difference in the screenshots in https://forums.openp...25#entry1475016


I agree, that is the sort method in all other versions of OpenPli, and I hope this will be changed.

 

 

Tried last openPLI with XStreamity 3.71 from feeds, and now is working ok. Thanks.



Re: OpenPLi-py3 #515 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,216 posts

+1,798
Excellent

Posted 22 August 2022 - 12:12

With the patch from @Huevos the subdirs are sorted by date and not random.

 

As there is no date visible for directories, the order appears random to the user.

 

I don't really care about underlying technical / geek arguments like "this is what file browsers do", the only valid argument is "what is logical for the user".

 

And my point is that there isn't a single argument to be made for "it is logical for a user to see the folder names in random order because 'under water' they are sorted by date".


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: OpenPLi-py3 #516 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,621 posts

+161
Excellent

Posted 22 August 2022 - 12:16

They are not random, they are sorted by date. If PLi is doing random that needs fixing.

 

If I do sort by date I want the folder with the most recent recordings displayed first. Anything else does not make sense on a sort by date.


Edited by Huevos, 22 August 2022 - 12:18.


Re: OpenPLi-py3 #517 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,216 posts

+1,798
Excellent

Posted 22 August 2022 - 12:21

For the user they are, since the date isn't visible.

 

And I don't care at all about the date of recording in a folder, I want the folders to be in the correct order alphabetically. And given the complaints by end-users currently testing, I'm not the only one.


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: OpenPLi-py3 #518 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,621 posts

+161
Excellent

Posted 22 August 2022 - 12:54

Well why don't you create a separate function for that and name it accordingly?



Re: OpenPLi-py3 #519 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,621 posts

+161
Excellent

Posted 22 August 2022 - 13:17

I haven't got access to a box with PLi loaded at the moment. What is the current list of sort options?

 

Ours looks like this:

 

Attached Files

  • Attached File  1.jpg   72.05KB   1 downloads


Re: OpenPLi-py3 #520 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,216 posts

+1,798
Excellent

Posted 22 August 2022 - 13:21

Well why don't you create a separate function for that and name it accordingly?

 

I could live with that, but I'm not skilled enough to do so.


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.



1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users