Also the others should have it as that are also have our skin available…. Other solution is we swap it also….. but is is note where a skin came from during the development of it… that was the ‘default’ and that one exactly could be ‘contra’
[WIP] PLi-DarkOS Skin
Started by DimitarCC, 05 Feb 2023 11:40
2022 replies to this topic
Re: [WIP] PLi-DarkOS Skin #1981
-
- PLi® Core member
- 57,058 posts
+698
Excellent
Posted 20 July 2024 - 22:00
WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W
Re: [WIP] PLi-DarkOS Skin #1982
-
- PLi® Contributor
- 1,549 posts
+67
Good
Posted 21 July 2024 - 12:51
Even your latest suggestion does not fit…. I would leave it as is, change the comments what wanwizard suggested and swap both at the e2os skin.
The skin needs special code that is only in the image at develop and 9.1 when it is releasedWell then you need to see if Dimitar is willing to update that argument in the skin.
Ok i have already changed the default to be SNRdB.
Also the others should have it as that are also have our skin available…. Other solution is we swap it also….. but is is note where a skin came from during the development of it… that was the ‘default’ and that one exactly could be ‘contra’
So the change to SNRdB is global change not only for PLi. So you dont need to swap anything...
Vu+DUO4KSE, DM920UHD, Vu+Uno4KSE, SF8008Mini, 2xPulse4K, Vu+Solo2, Dreambox DM500HD, Triax 78 (7E,9E,13E,19.2E,23.5E) & 2xTriax 78 (39E)
Re: [WIP] PLi-DarkOS Skin #1983
-
- PLi® Core member
- 70,204 posts
+1,798
Excellent
Posted 21 July 2024 - 13:26
Brillant.
I'll change the config to
It is implemented as a toggle, so it should say something like "Toggle the SNR values displayed" with "When set to 'Yes", all locations where SNR is displayed in dB's will show an SNR percentage, and vice versa" because that is what I understand it does....
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: [WIP] PLi-DarkOS Skin #1984
-
- PLi® Core member
- 57,058 posts
+698
Excellent
Posted 21 July 2024 - 13:27
@wanwizard… yep.
WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W
Re: [WIP] PLi-DarkOS Skin #1985
-
- PLi® Contributor
- 4,621 posts
+161
Excellent
Posted 21 July 2024 - 16:24
Re: [WIP] PLi-DarkOS Skin #1986
-
- PLi® Core member
- 70,204 posts
+1,798
Excellent
Posted 21 July 2024 - 16:27
Thanks, that will fix the update for everyone using an internal system for DNS ( many PiHole users out there for example ) !
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: [WIP] PLi-DarkOS Skin #1987
-
- PLi® Core member
- 70,204 posts
+1,798
Excellent
Posted 21 July 2024 - 18:39
There's some regression in the skin.
The colours are back to what they were, like light-green for the current channel, and no seperators between programmes.
Attached Files
-
1_0_19_22C5_80D_2_11A0000_0_0_0_20240721183833.jpg 141.72KB
3 downloads
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: [WIP] PLi-DarkOS Skin #1988
-
- PLi® Contributor
- 4,621 posts
+161
Excellent
Posted 21 July 2024 - 18:49
There's some regression in the skin.
The colours are back to what they were, like light-green for the current channel, and no seperators between programmes.
How is he supposed to deal with this. On boxes like Pulse the rendering is slow, so he removed the graphics folder.
https://github.com/D...5edaf6c28d0f4f5
In other images it is possible to turn graphics mode on and off, but in PLi the only way is to remove the folder.
Edited by Huevos, 21 July 2024 - 18:50.
Re: [WIP] PLi-DarkOS Skin #1989
-
- PLi® Core member
- 70,204 posts
+1,798
Excellent
Posted 21 July 2024 - 19:40
How is he supposed to deal with this. On boxes like Pulse the rendering is slow, so he removed the graphics folder.
Would have been handy to discuss the issue first, that's what this topic is for.
So we could check if we find it to be a problem, and if so, it we would implement such a toggle to deal with it.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: [WIP] PLi-DarkOS Skin #1990
-
- PLi® Core member
- 57,058 posts
+698
Excellent
Posted 21 July 2024 - 19:50
Can maybe someone split the boxinfo stuff from the skin discussion?
WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W
Re: [WIP] PLi-DarkOS Skin #1991
-
- PLi® Contributor
- 1,549 posts
+67
Good
Posted 22 July 2024 - 07:08
There's some regression in the skin.
The colours are back to what they were, like light-green for the current channel, and no seperators between programmes.
I see. Well i have removed the graphics since with them it is imposible to work with GMEPG on HiSilicon boxes without HW alphablending support.
Pli doesnt have option to disable graphics per box (OE-A images can do that). So i have removed the graphics completely...And now it seems there is issue or something not implemented right in GMEPG on Pli.
On ViX i have no issues with that mode...
1_0_1_86_6_1_1860000_0_0_0_20240722090702.jpg 113.96KB
3 downloads
Edit: Maybe we can add that option to PLi too and then i can return the graphics back....
Edited by DimitarCC, 22 July 2024 - 07:11.
Vu+DUO4KSE, DM920UHD, Vu+Uno4KSE, SF8008Mini, 2xPulse4K, Vu+Solo2, Dreambox DM500HD, Triax 78 (7E,9E,13E,19.2E,23.5E) & 2xTriax 78 (39E)
Re: [WIP] PLi-DarkOS Skin #1992
-
- PLi® Contributor
- 1,549 posts
+67
Good
Posted 22 July 2024 - 09:47
Insane it also has default a kind of mini gmepg… with left/right (where we zap) that is not skinned yet in the e2os skin…. And in the mini gmepg the standby button is blocked.
So should we add the option to be possible to be turned off graphics?
When i using darkos on Pulse4K in Pli it is unusable if graphics are there....
Vu+DUO4KSE, DM920UHD, Vu+Uno4KSE, SF8008Mini, 2xPulse4K, Vu+Solo2, Dreambox DM500HD, Triax 78 (7E,9E,13E,19.2E,23.5E) & 2xTriax 78 (39E)
Re: [WIP] PLi-DarkOS Skin #1993
-
- PLi® Core member
- 57,058 posts
+698
Excellent
Posted 22 July 2024 - 09:59
So should we add the option to be possible to be turned off graphics?
When i using darkos on Pulse4K in Pli it is unusable if graphics are there....
Is this due to svgs?.....
When it becomes unusable then indeed it should be disabled... 'somehow'.... but not by the user I would say...
Edited by littlesat, 22 July 2024 - 10:46.
WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W
Re: [WIP] PLi-DarkOS Skin #1994
-
- PLi® Contributor
- 4,621 posts
+161
Excellent
Posted 22 July 2024 - 12:59
So should we add the option to be possible to be turned off graphics?
When i using darkos on Pulse4K in Pli it is unusable if graphics are there....
Is this due to svgs?.....
When it becomes unusable then indeed it should be disabled... 'somehow'.... but not by the user I would say...
Well it is not "unstable", the problem is no hardware acceleration. So possible fix is add to add an entry in enigma.info if the box has hardware accel or not and use that, or any similar method. Otherwise the only other option is from a user config.
Not sure why you don't want users to be able to access such things. It is like forcing everyone to drive an automatic.
Edited by Huevos, 22 July 2024 - 13:00.
Re: [WIP] PLi-DarkOS Skin #1995
-
- PLi® Core member
- 70,204 posts
+1,798
Excellent
Posted 22 July 2024 - 13:35
I see. Well i have removed the graphics since with them it is imposible to work with GMEPG on HiSilicon boxes without HW alphablending support.
Pli doesnt have option to disable graphics per box (OE-A images can do that). So i have removed the graphics completely...And now it seems there is issue or something not implemented right in GMEPG on Pli.
What exactly is the issue, as my office test box currently is a HiSil box (an SF8008), and I've never seen any problem?
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: [WIP] PLi-DarkOS Skin #1996
-
- PLi® Contributor
- 1,549 posts
+67
Good
Posted 22 July 2024 - 13:45
On Sf8008 there are no issues. But on AB PulSe4K navigating in GMEPG is very very slow with graphics enabled. Maybe it will be the same in Dual4K....
Edited by DimitarCC, 22 July 2024 - 13:45.
Vu+DUO4KSE, DM920UHD, Vu+Uno4KSE, SF8008Mini, 2xPulse4K, Vu+Solo2, Dreambox DM500HD, Triax 78 (7E,9E,13E,19.2E,23.5E) & 2xTriax 78 (39E)
Re: [WIP] PLi-DarkOS Skin #1997
-
- PLi® Core member
- 70,204 posts
+1,798
Excellent
Posted 22 July 2024 - 13:56
Ok, so it's not an issue with HiSilicon chipsets perse, but with specific boxes? Which might be a driver issue then?
I have a Pulse 4K here, I'll try to find some time for it later this week.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: [WIP] PLi-DarkOS Skin #1998
-
- PLi® Contributor
- 4,621 posts
+161
Excellent
Posted 22 July 2024 - 14:10
Ok, so it's not an issue with HiSilicon chipsets perse, but with specific boxes? Which might be a driver issue then?
I have a Pulse 4K here, I'll try to find some time for it later this week.
I think you will also see this on H8 and H11. Maybe other boxes too as PLi build so many.
Edited by Huevos, 22 July 2024 - 14:15.
Re: [WIP] PLi-DarkOS Skin #1999
-
- PLi® Core member
- 70,204 posts
+1,798
Excellent
Posted 22 July 2024 - 14:52
I think you will also see this on H8 and H11. Maybe other boxes too as PLi build so many.
That suggests boxes with the low-end HI3798MV200 SoC ?
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: [WIP] PLi-DarkOS Skin #2000
-
- PLi® Contributor
- 4,621 posts
+161
Excellent
Posted 22 July 2024 - 15:11
I think you will also see this on H8 and H11. Maybe other boxes too as PLi build so many.
That suggests boxes with the low-end HI3798MV200 SoC ?
I'm not sure. As far as I know these are the only boxes openvix builds with this problem, and we don't build Pulse (except a test image for Dimitar).
12 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 11 guests, 0 anonymous users
-
Bing (1)
