Then here I have the V3 version and Pastoman has the V4 version
Tuner problem USTYM 4K PRO
Started by Pastoman, 28 Feb 2024 09:25
39 replies to this topic
Re: Tuner problem USTYM 4K PRO #22
-
- PLi® Core member
- 70,256 posts
+1,799
Excellent
Posted 5 March 2024 - 13:33
If the tuner is not detected, the driver needs updating. Only uClan can do that. and they'll have to, as the driver in the BSP is quite a bit older than in OE-A, who did receive an update about 7 months ago.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: Tuner problem USTYM 4K PRO #23
-
- PLi® Core member
- 70,256 posts
+1,799
Excellent
Posted 5 March 2024 - 13:40
I also see that OE-A doesn't have done an update to their oem-info, so the box is still called "4K PRO" in the image and the web interface, and not "4K Supreme" like with the SF8008.
What exactly is the name on the front of the box of the V4 ?
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: Tuner problem USTYM 4K PRO #24
-
- New Member
- 4 posts
0
Neutral
Posted 6 March 2024 - 09:42
This is uClan Ustym 4K PRO - 2024 (v4) Front panel and Giftbox difference.
Attached Files
-
Ustym4KPRO-2024.png 77.85KB
2 downloads
-
Ustym4KPRO-2024_1.png 433.35KB
2 downloads
Re: Tuner problem USTYM 4K PRO #25
-
- Member
- 6 posts
0
Neutral
Posted 6 March 2024 - 11:00
Updated new drivers for uClan Ustym 4K PRO-2024: https://github.com/O...ta-uclan/pull/5
Re: Tuner problem USTYM 4K PRO #26
-
- PLi® Core member
- 70,256 posts
+1,799
Excellent
Posted 6 March 2024 - 11:13
Yes, we know. Merged, and available in the develop build when the current run is finished.
If, when that is the case, someone can test them and confirm they work, we can backport them to 9.0-release.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: Tuner problem USTYM 4K PRO #27
-
- PLi® Core member
- 70,256 posts
+1,799
Excellent
Posted 6 March 2024 - 11:15
This is uClan Ustym 4K PRO - 2024 (v4) Front panel and Giftbox difference.
Thanks. So not a different name on the box, just a different layout and a wifi icon...
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: Tuner problem USTYM 4K PRO #28
-
- Member
- 6 posts
0
Neutral
Posted 6 March 2024 - 11:36
Yes.
Tomorow I will test develop build and let you know
Re: Tuner problem USTYM 4K PRO #29
-
- Senior Member
- 195 posts
+4
Neutral
Posted 6 March 2024 - 13:02
c812 - DualBand 802.11 ac/abgn
c82c - DualBand 802.11 ac/abgn + Bluetooth
Re: Tuner problem USTYM 4K PRO #30
-
- PLi® Core member
- 70,256 posts
+1,799
Excellent
Posted 6 March 2024 - 14:59
Thanks.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: Tuner problem USTYM 4K PRO #31
-
- Member
- 6 posts
0
Neutral
Re: Tuner problem USTYM 4K PRO #32
-
- PLi® Core member
- 70,256 posts
+1,799
Excellent
Posted 7 March 2024 - 13:05
Perfect, thanks for the feedback.
I'll see if I can get this backported to 9.0-release.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: Tuner problem USTYM 4K PRO #33
-
- New Member
- 4 posts
0
Neutral
Posted 7 March 2024 - 17:39
This information (Tuner X: AVL62X1 DVBS2) - is wrong. Availink AVL62X1 is DVBS/S2/S2X demod, software engineer (who create that driver for OpenATV), just didn't care about CORRECT tuner name in the driver file.
So, in the next drivers versions this mistake will be fixed. Will be written: Tuner X: AVL62X1 (DVBS2X)
I just report it to ALL, (from engineers side) for make all situation clear about uClan Ustym 4K PRO is DVBS2 or DVBS2X.
Correct final answer is: Ustym 4K PRO-2024 (HW v4) of course support DVBS2X !
P.S. Who need last drivers (for this and other HW) versions for create E2 images, can PM to me.
Attached Files
-
Mistake_DVBS2X.png 102.23KB
1 downloads
Re: Tuner problem USTYM 4K PRO #34
-
- PLi® Core member
- 70,256 posts
+1,799
Excellent
Posted 7 March 2024 - 17:47
Drivers are created by the (OEM) distributor of the box (which could be the manufacturer, but often is not), they are they only ones with the source code, which is under heavy NDA. And in our case it is this engineer that needs to maintain the BSP we use.
We don't accept the behaviour other images makers do, where the drivers are just thrown over the fence, with a "here, good luck" message. If a distributor wants to make money using free open source software, they can put some effort in too...
Having said that, S2X only says it does support "some" extended capability, it doesn't say anything about which ones ( all capabilities are optional in S2X ), so if you need a specific extended capability, you still need to look up the specs for the ALV62X1.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: Tuner problem USTYM 4K PRO #35
-
- PLi® Core member
- 70,256 posts
+1,799
Excellent
Posted 7 March 2024 - 21:11
I've backported the BSP to 8.3-release, a new build for the ustym4kpro is currently running.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: Tuner problem USTYM 4K PRO #36
-
- Member
- 6 posts
0
Neutral
Posted 8 March 2024 - 10:17
Thx
This information (Tuner X: AVL62X1 DVBS2) - is wrong. Availink AVL62X1 is DVBS/S2/S2X demod, software engineer (who create that driver for OpenATV), just didn't care about CORRECT tuner name in the driver file.
The same cosmetic defect is also in SF8008 Supreme and TRIO 4K PRO.
Re: Tuner problem USTYM 4K PRO #37
-
- PLi® Core member
- 70,256 posts
+1,799
Excellent
Posted 8 March 2024 - 15:54
Quite logical, same manufacturer, same driver developer. So most likely copy/paste from one brand to another...
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: Tuner problem USTYM 4K PRO #38
-
- New Member
- 4 posts
0
Neutral
Posted 10 March 2024 - 07:43
Thx
This information (Tuner X: AVL62X1 DVBS2) - is wrong. Availink AVL62X1 is DVBS/S2/S2X demod, software engineer (who create that driver for OpenATV), just didn't care about CORRECT tuner name in the driver file.
The same cosmetic defect is also in SF8008 Supreme and TRIO 4K PRO.
uClan Ustym 4K PRO and Octagon SF8008 used absolutely same pcb. Same elements and schematic. Later will post pictures here.
Quite logical, same manufacturer, same driver developer. So most likely copy/paste from one brand to another...
Absolutely correct. I can add: from the beginning for uClan Ustym 4K PRO was made special firmware Denys_OS (Define_OS), in FullHD mode, based on uClan Denys H.265 model (very famous DVBS2/IPTV device). So new firmware for Ustym 4K PRO was done using couple of ideas from successful Denys H.265...
Re: Tuner problem USTYM 4K PRO #39
-
- PLi® Core member
- 70,256 posts
+1,799
Excellent
Posted 10 March 2024 - 15:55
I've checked the source code of Define_OS (or at least the bits I could find). It is based on an old version of Enigma2, only with a heavily modified GUI.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: Tuner problem USTYM 4K PRO #40
-
- New Member
- 4 posts
0
Neutral
Posted 7 April 2024 - 07:32
Same pcb, same WiFi type, same tuners/demods.
uClan Ustym 4K PRO Ultimate 2024 v4 inside:
Picture from the official website.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
