sat-ire

The forum is called

[EN] Third-Party Development
Discussions about scripts, plugins, enigma modifications, C++, Python, ...

 

so technically @sat-ire is right, it is not clear what we mean by it. This forum started as an internal developer forum, when it changed to a public forum the description simply wasn't changed.

Thanks WanWizard.

As a newbie I can only judge a forum by its title after all.

And, as I said, I hadn't ever used this image before because autocam wasn't supported so I went directly to a third party developer in the belief that a modification had been found.

I now also find that cccaminfo greenscreens and refuses to uninstall!

Not an openpli developer...

 

The plugin's developer (obviously) 

 

What's with all the semantics in these parts? 

ANd as it's a "Third Party" development forum why would you think I think he's an openpli developer 

Not an openpli developer...

The plugin's developer (obviously) 

What's with all the semantics in these parts? 

This is not a third party support forum, it's a development forum. For people wanting to develop something, and want assistance.

 

I don't think anyone has said that we would do something to prevent a user from doing with his STB what he wants. We don't care.

What I said was that we don't think it's a good idea (for a lot of reasons already given), and therefore we are not going to make it for you.

You might need to change the name of the forum then because it's misleading

My questions were directed at the developer, so not only have I already made up my mind that I want it (and explicitly mentioned I already use a version in another image and that it's a must-have for me), the developer obviously also feels there is a demand for it.

As enigma2 is designed for more tuners and switching emus may destroy recordings this feature is in fact a nogo... You don't want corrupted recordings... I also see now reason why this is really required...

I should think the choice should be mine - and others - to make?

I do see reasons why it is really required.

Blackhole includes it - it works very well on that image.

FYI I'm already aware of the "official party-line" on the matter, it's the reason why I never used PLI in the past.

So, I assume that these last two replies (in what I thought was a third party support forum?) means you will (for some reason) do your best to not make this plugin possible rather than allow users of the image a choice whether or not to install it themselves?