Jump to content


Photo

Clarketech ET9000 common bug thread

ET9000

  • Please log in to reply
146 replies to this topic

Re: Clarketech ET9000 common bug thread #141 dispatcher

  • Senior Member
  • 76 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 3 January 2011 - 13:32

I don't know if this is a bug or if it has been discussed before, but I can't find anything using search:

When I input "cat/proc/cpuinfo" or "cat/proc/meminfo" in my ET9000 it seems I get the infos of the VU+DUO:

root@et9000:/# cat /proc/cpuinfo
system type : BCM97xxx Settop Platform
build target : unknown
processor : 0
cpu model : Brcm4380 V4.4 FPU V0.1
cpu MHz : 402.43
BogoMIPS : 402.43 ( udelay_val : 201216 HZ = 1000 )
wait instruction : yes
microsecond timers : yes
tlb_entries : 32
extra interrupt vector : yes
hardware watchpoint : no
ASEs implemented : mips16
VCED exceptions : not available
VCEI exceptions : not available
RAC setting : Unknown
unaligned access : 970997
rdhwr/brdhwr traps : 0 / 0
process migrations : 287
processor : 1
cpu model : Brcm4380 V4.4 FPU V0.1
cpu MHz : 404.48
BogoMIPS : 404.48 ( udelay_val : 202240 HZ = 1000 )
wait instruction : yes
microsecond timers : yes
tlb_entries : 32
extra interrupt vector : yes
hardware watchpoint : no
ASEs implemented : mips16
VCED exceptions : not available
VCEI exceptions : not available
RAC setting : Unknown


root@et9000:/# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 383804 kB
MemFree: 4108 kB
Buffers: 4 kB
Cached: 304944 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB
Active: 59856 kB
Inactive: 289152 kB
HighTotal: 0 kB
HighFree: 0 kB
LowTotal: 383804 kB
LowFree: 4108 kB
SwapTotal: 0 kB
SwapFree: 0 kB
Dirty: 0 kB
Writeback: 0 kB
AnonPages: 44048 kB
Mapped: 11748 kB
Slab: 13752 kB
PageTables: 368 kB
NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
Bounce: 0 kB
CommitLimit: 191900 kB
Committed_AS: 70304 kB
VmallocTotal: 786424 kB
VmallocUsed: 14520 kB
VmallocChunk: 771752 kB


"free" gives the following output:

root@et9000:/# free
total used free shared buffers
Mem: 383804 379860 3944 0 4
Swap: 0 0 0
Total: 383804 379860 3944


I always thought this info is read "on the fly" and actual, but maybe I'm wrong.

Does anyone know of a tool or plugin which displays this info correctly?

Atemio Nemesis | GiGaBlue HD Quad+ | ET9200 | ET9000 | DM7025+ | DM500s | Sharp LC46LE820E
Triax TD88 13.0°E - 19.2°E - 23.5°E - 28.2°E | Opticum Red Rocket Quad LNB's | Spaun SAR411 Switches


Re: Clarketech ET9000 common bug thread #142 dispatcher

  • Senior Member
  • 76 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 4 January 2011 - 00:52

Oops! My Bad! I guess I'm still seeing parts of my long RS232 logging sessions flying by while troubleshooting my previous broken receiver:

BCM97413B1 CFE v2.26, CFE core v2.12, Endian Mode: Little
Build Date: Thu Nov 18 00:25:40 WEST 2010 (Administrator@buildserver)
Copyright © Broadcom Corporation.

start cfe init device
sec-0 nblks=8 blksiz=8192
sec-1 nblks=63 blksiz=65536
Enabling NAND flash at CS1, NOR flash at CS0
NAND Flash size = 128MB
CPU speed: 405MHz
Memory Config: 64-bit UMA
Device Tech: 1Gb
Total memory: 512MB
Boot Device: NOR
Total flash: 4MB


I was totally shure I had seen some different looking specs flying by, and there they are!

Cleared some plugins and skins and now the meminfo looks better:

root@et9000:~# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 383804 kB
MemFree: 260240 kB
Buffers: 36 kB
Cached: 46672 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB
Active: 58980 kB
Inactive: 34032 kB
HighTotal: 0 kB
HighFree: 0 kB
LowTotal: 383804 kB
LowFree: 260240 kB
SwapTotal: 0 kB
SwapFree: 0 kB
Dirty: 0 kB
Writeback: 0 kB
AnonPages: 46356 kB
Mapped: 11920 kB
Slab: 13660 kB
PageTables: 412 kB
NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
Bounce: 0 kB
CommitLimit: 191900 kB
Committed_AS: 72088 kB
VmallocTotal: 786424 kB
VmallocUsed: 15144 kB
VmallocChunk: 771208 kB


Maybe there was something eating my memory and is now uninstalled.

Atemio Nemesis | GiGaBlue HD Quad+ | ET9200 | ET9000 | DM7025+ | DM500s | Sharp LC46LE820E
Triax TD88 13.0°E - 19.2°E - 23.5°E - 28.2°E | Opticum Red Rocket Quad LNB's | Spaun SAR411 Switches


Re: Clarketech ET9000 common bug thread #143 bobby1234

  • Senior Member
  • 27 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 5 January 2011 - 17:24

I am not getting pictures with latest 2.0 beta and ccam on channels on 1 west transmitting with SR 30000 like 12130 H


Can anybody confirm?

Re: Clarketech ET9000 common bug thread #144 bobby1234

  • Senior Member
  • 27 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 5 January 2011 - 18:40

Sorry seems to be a local problem at my end in cable for 1 of the 2 tuners regarding SR 30000. Was not a problem for me on the Vu+ Duo

Re: Clarketech ET9000 common bug thread #145 bobby1234

  • Senior Member
  • 27 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 5 January 2011 - 19:19

Further testing reveals it is not a cable issue after all. It is only an issue on tuner 2 input even with the same signal that works in tuner 1. I tried changing the cable from tuner 1 to tuner 2. Strange issue.

Can somebody else confirm this on their ET9000? SR 30000 issues on tuner 2 but not on tuner 1?

Re: Clarketech ET9000 common bug thread #146 herbie65

  • Member
  • 23 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 20 January 2011 - 01:25

in the last Pli the date-clock info in the standby mode is still bad in the display.
I hope this will be solved in the next Pli.
--------- Clarke Tech ET9000

Re: Clarketech ET9000 common bug thread #147 MiLo

  • PLi® Core member
  • 14,052 posts

+298
Excellent

Posted 20 January 2011 - 07:58

http://openpli.git.s...13cfa62c2977ab5
Real musicians never die - they just decompose



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: ET9000

14 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 14 guests, 0 anonymous users