Sure
https://github.com/o...b9a2ef3fbf6b6c1
Look at changes in lib/python/Plugins/SystemPlugins/SoftwareManager/ImageBackup.py
Posted 11 December 2015 - 19:56
Sure
https://github.com/o...b9a2ef3fbf6b6c1
Look at changes in lib/python/Plugins/SystemPlugins/SoftwareManager/ImageBackup.py
Posted 12 December 2015 - 12:18
No. But I'm working on it. Currently it looks quite good, that I can add solo4k support as I'm able to umount root filesystem from my tool. But don't expect new version in the next days. Perhaps end of the year.
By the way: The name of my tool is ofgwrite
Posted 12 December 2015 - 22:17
Posted 13 December 2015 - 12:30
i flashed back backup taken by ur plugin version git77 & git85 for openpli4 & other images , but not fully booting & starts , in fact it stays on initial splash screen without farther progression to start the image , when i flashed ur old version git66 , i noticed the whole correct partion size 7168mb is created & backuped & image with git66 do full booting & strart working with no initial booting issue , so i came with conclusion that the actual kernal size in git77 & git 85 is not been fully backuped thats why image doesnt fully boots & stuck/stop on initial booting splash screen
Edited by fankoosh, 13 December 2015 - 12:31.
Posted 15 December 2015 - 17:09
i flashed back backup taken by ur plugin version git77 & git85 for openpli4 & other images , but not fully booting & starts , in fact it stays on initial splash screen without farther progression to start the image , when i flashed ur old version git66 , i noticed the whole correct partion size 7168mb is created & backuped & image with git66 do full booting & strart working with no initial booting issue , so i came with conclusion that the actual kernal size in git77 & git 85 is not been fully backuped thats why image doesnt fully boots & stuck/stop on initial booting splash screen
Did you try the latest version and if so what was the result?
Posted 15 December 2015 - 23:01
I'll post the outcome tomorrow.Since today the Xsarius Fusion HD is supported, this is however not fully tested at the moment because of the lack of testing material. Fusion HD owners please feel free to test and report the outcome.
Owners (PLi developers?) of a Fusion HD SE could you report the outcome of the commandcat /proc/stb/info/hwmodelAlso removed the partial support for non supported receivers
Mijn schotel is een T90 met 10 LNB's. Daarnaast voor de fun nog een draaibaar systeem met een Triax TD 78.
Dreamboxen heb ik niet meer echt actief. Verder heb ik ook nog een een VU+ duo2 met 500Gb harddisk + een VU+ Uno, Zero, Solo 4K, Ultimo 4K, Zero 4K, Uno 4Kse. + ook nog een Xtrend ET7x00. Daarnaast heb ik ook nog diverse andere modellen w.o. een Formuler F4, ET8500, ET7500, Mut@nt 2400HD, Xsarius Fusion HD se en verder nog wel het e.e.a. waarmee op verzoek vanalles wordt getest. Iemand moet het tenslotte doen.
Los van de eerder genoemde modellen heb ik nog wel een rits aan testsamples als Mut@nt 2400HD, HD60, GB UE4K, GB Trio4K, Maxitec Multibox combo en Twin, Octagon sf8008, sf8008 mini en last but nog least enkele modellen van het Grieks Duitse Edision.
Voor centrale opslag van media gebruik ik een Qnap 219P met tweemaal 2 Tb harddisks + een Synology DS414 met 12 Tb Totale opslag.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Many answers to your question can be found in our wiki: Just one click away from this "solutioncentre".
Als ik alles al wist hoefde ik ook niets te vragen. If I had all the knowledge I had no questions at all.
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users