Jump to content


Photo

BackupSuite


  • Please log in to reply
1306 replies to this topic

Re: BackupSuite #1081 nafaal

  • Member
  • 4 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 4 May 2019 - 18:38

Hello! Have the following error with my Mutant HD60: (with OpenPLI 7.0)

 

 

 

Full back-up direct to USB -> /media/usb (59.3G, available 57.6G)


MUTANT HD60 BACK-UP TOOL, FOR MAKING A COMPLETE BACK-UP


Version: git446


Some information about the task
KERNEL size to be backed up: 8192 KB
ROOTFS size to be backed up: 260216 KB
=TOTAL size to be backed up: 268408 KB (= 262 MB)


Please be patient, a backup will now be made, this will take about: 5.57 minutes


Create: kerneldump
cat: can't open '/sys/firmware/devicetree/base/chosen/kerneldev': No such file or directory
.bin = STARTUP_
Create: root.ubifstar: ./run/msg.sock/1548: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/1879: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2553: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/1707: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2770: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2412: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/1545: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2772: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2660: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2549: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/1550: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2775: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2345: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2408: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2552: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/1876: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2342: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/1705: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2555: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2661: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2409: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2406: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2658: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2410: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2551: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/1706: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/1547: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/1877: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2343: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2771: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2662: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/1708: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2773: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/1703: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2769: socket ignored
tar: ./run/msg.sock/2664: socket ignored
mv: can't rename '/media/usb/bi/.bin': No such file or directory


Image creation FAILED!

 

Is there any solution, yet? Regards.



Re: BackupSuite #1082 kalkan99

  • Member
  • 6 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 8 July 2019 - 11:58

Hello to everyone,
my satellite device vu + duo 4k
I love openpli software.
I'm trying to get a backup from my device in both 7.0 and 7.1 software.
The options I use are backupsuite, automatic fullbackup plugins.
seems to have taken a backup, but the device does not turn on again when loading the device.
is this the right method?
or is there another method?
or what could be the error?
thanks.



Re: BackupSuite #1083 master64nl

  • Senior Member
  • 72 posts

+1
Neutral

Posted 17 July 2019 - 15:49

Here's the mipsel download from a mipsel machine (et8000)

Ik heb deze geïnstalleerd op mijn dm800se maar hij doet niets. Weet iemand hoe dit werkt?

I installed this ipk on my dm800 but it doesn’t work. Anyone knows how this should work?

1 x DM800SE, 1 x DM800SEV2, 1 x DM520, 1 x SAB SKY 4900 HD, Visiosat with Astra1, Hotbird, Astra2 and Astra3, Philips 56pfl9954h_12

 


Re: BackupSuite #1084 master64nl

  • Senior Member
  • 72 posts

+1
Neutral

Posted 20 July 2019 - 09:39

I managed to get it to work, https://wiki.openpli...kup/BackupSuite"]https://wiki.openpli.org/Backup/BackupSuite. See the WIKI. As a test I turned the box off with the USB stick connected. The blue led started blinking but kept on blinking ‘until pids fly’. So I restored the backup although this doesn’t work as described. One can only create a backup on your NAS which succeeded although this isn’t described too how restore this. Anyone has a hint?

Edited by Frenske, 20 July 2019 - 10:00.
Please post in the proper language. You posted in Dutch although this is the English section. Graag voortaan in de juiste taal posten. Indien je die taal niet machtig bent dan maak je (eventueel) een nieuw topic aan in de juiste taal.

1 x DM800SE, 1 x DM800SEV2, 1 x DM520, 1 x SAB SKY 4900 HD, Visiosat with Astra1, Hotbird, Astra2 and Astra3, Philips 56pfl9954h_12

 


Re: BackupSuite #1085 Persian Prince

  • Senior Member
  • 1,982 posts

+247
Excellent

Posted 10 September 2019 - 20:58

@PLi

 

I think it's better to set your "reporefs.conf" to "a9ec02a55887b46cdca1c93a921088b50cd7e0a3" (even for develop) because it is possible that my future commits break the support for you as I want to use our "getBoxBrand" and some other imports which you don't have.

 

As we're using the master branch of OE (which is newer than any other) for Open Vision 9.2, I'm going to do some changes in both python and shell scripts.

 

I will try my best to keep this plugin backward compatible and won't show errors with more "try ... except" but for now use that hash then I give you the green light that everything is ok again.

 

Regards,

Persian Prince


Edited by Persian Prince, 10 September 2019 - 20:58.

Open Vision sources: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2


Re: BackupSuite #1086 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 68,307 posts

+1,719
Excellent

Posted 10 September 2019 - 21:15

You're not saying that you've invented yet another flavour of "branding"?


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: BackupSuite #1087 Persian Prince

  • Senior Member
  • 1,982 posts

+247
Excellent

Posted 10 September 2019 - 21:29

You're not saying that you've invented yet another flavour of "branding"?

 

Not like that, for being compatible with OE-A plugins we have our own branding module which is based on their sources but without remote/webif and extra things: https://github.com/O...branding-module

 

Also we have "getBoxBrand" inside enigma2 just like "getBoxType" which helps a lot to reduce the code and check so many things faster.

 

We have our own Open WebIF flavour supporting all brands/models: https://github.com/O...ionE2/OpenWebif

 

Just take a look at https://github.com/O.../data/rc_models and see how many remotes we provide but at last with less image size thanks to https://github.com/O...els/Makefile.am and brand detection.

 

enigma2-plugins: https://github.com/O...enigma2-plugins

 

tuxtxt: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2/tuxtxt

 

gstreamer1.0-plugin-multibox-dvbmediasink: https://github.com/O...ox-dvbmediasink

 

satip-client: https://github.com/O...E2/satip-client

 

servicehisilicon: https://github.com/O...ervicehisilicon

 

minidlna: https://github.com/O...sionE2/minidlna (which you're using it too)

 

libdvbsi: https://github.com/O...sionE2/libdvbsi

 

blindscan-s2: https://github.com/O...E2/blindscan-s2

 

dvbsnoop: https://github.com/O...sionE2/dvbsnoop (which you're using it too)

 

libdvbcsa: https://github.com/O...ionE2/libdvbcsa

 

And more ...

 

The thing is we're supporting more brands/models in our sources and we can't patch everything, instead we maintain our own.

 

There are so many disagreements, for example we don't like having multiple branches instead we use if conditions which you don't like.


Open Vision sources: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2


Re: BackupSuite #1088 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 68,307 posts

+1,719
Excellent

Posted 10 September 2019 - 21:42

The more if conditions you have, the more complex it will be to maintain it. You'll figure that out soon enough. ;)

 

For OE-A compatibility, we inject a dummy, like so: https://github.com/O...xbranding.patch

 

I was just wondering if we will have to do this soon for all your stuff too.

 

Too bad the more people want to do their own thing instead of cooperate, the more complex things become, the less time is spend on new development, and the sooner it will all come to an end...


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: BackupSuite #1089 Persian Prince

  • Senior Member
  • 1,982 posts

+247
Excellent

Posted 10 September 2019 - 22:26

I disagree, we use if conditions + MACHINE_FEATURES and it's easier than having multiple branches.

 

We support old API (dm800 for example), RaspberryPi and new OpenSSL and OE changes in enigma2 all with if conditions.

 

Injecting a dummy is another type of patching things and we're against patching. We do even maintain sh4 kernel and drivers with less patching. The branding module bring some good imports for us like "getDisplayType" which you can't get it with a dummy.

 

Anyway I don't want Backup Suite requires things like this I just wanted to inform you not get the updates till the green light.

 

We always contribute and stay friends, even I brought IanSave's time/date changes from ViX/Beyonwiz to Open Vision with his guid and soon I will send the PR for PLi.

 

If you check https://github.com/O...hs/contributors I'm #9 in contributors and even if you consider my commits useless (which could be as I'm still Senior Member here), did I ever give up sending PRs to PLi? No! As I see you all our friends even if I'm the youngest here because still I like learning from you.

 

I don't want to say I'm the good guy here but at least we try sending PRs upstream, here I want to thank ViX team for being friendly and contributing generously.

 

You should see how PurE2 team bring shame to this scene with their closed-source plugins even skins, they're using our sources with 0 contribution to open source.


Open Vision sources: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2


Re: BackupSuite #1090 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 68,307 posts

+1,719
Excellent

Posted 10 September 2019 - 22:50

Not sure what you mean by "multiple branches" vs "if's".

 

But if you mean the BSP's, it is a logical outcome from the fact we don't maintain those. Obviously, if you maintain them yourselfs you can put it all in one repo, and have one recipe per package for all hardware, instead of a recipe per vendor.

 

But we can't / won't, we want commitment from the vendor, instead of them throwing drivers over the fence, we do all the work, and they make money of it...

 

For the rest, Ok. clear. I've pinned it in develop.


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: BackupSuite #1091 Persian Prince

  • Senior Member
  • 1,982 posts

+247
Excellent

Posted 10 September 2019 - 23:09

I mean enigma2 branches and patching other repos when we can do all with if conditions.

 

Also "athoik" and "betacentauri" have write access to Backup Suite repo so they can help with PLi compatibility if it was needed :)


Open Vision sources: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2


Re: BackupSuite #1092 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 68,307 posts

+1,719
Excellent

Posted 10 September 2019 - 23:59

If you have different build and release environments which you have to build and maintain simultaneously, like we do, you can't do without different branches, it's impossible.

 

If you only build "nighly's" from your current code base, obviously that isn't an issue.

 

And we don't "patch" other repo's, we have to patch OE-A plugins that use their box branding, so we can map it to our SystemInfo.


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: BackupSuite #1093 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 56,123 posts

+685
Excellent

Posted 13 September 2019 - 10:07

Please stop using openatv like branding and use the simpel solution wanwizard invent to get around the openatv’s branding ‘crap’

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: BackupSuite #1094 Persian Prince

  • Senior Member
  • 1,982 posts

+247
Excellent

Posted 13 September 2019 - 10:11

Please stop using openatv like branding and use the simpel solution wanwizard invent to get around the openatv’s branding ‘crap’

 

What do you mean?

 

Our "getBoxBrand" is inside enigma2 just like "getBoxType", even our "getBoxProc" is inside enigma2 but it's different.


Open Vision sources: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2


Re: BackupSuite #1095 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 56,123 posts

+685
Excellent

Posted 13 September 2019 - 10:13

It is just stupid to invent another thing around this... as what we already have is sufficiant... invent other things without making proper agreements breaks compatibility. It should be ‘ours’ not ‘yours’...
I think it is a bit a pitty you forked and go on your own way instead of somehow work together.

Edited by littlesat, 13 September 2019 - 10:35.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: BackupSuite #1096 foxbob

  • Senior Member
  • 612 posts

+18
Neutral

Posted 16 September 2019 - 06:08

I test this "a9ec02a55887b46cdca1c93a921088b50cd7e0a3" on thud branch-not work.

 

Plugin version     = git467+a9ec02a
Back-up media      = /hdd
Filesystem                Size      Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1               915.9G    679.6G    189.7G  78% /media/usb
Back-up = 2019.09.16_07:43
Version = openpli develop 
Flashed = 2019.09.15_18:43
Updated = 2019.09.15_23:33
Drivers = et-dvb-modules-kodi-et1x000 - 4.1.37+20170927-r2
Enigma2 = 2019-09-15-develop
Working directory  = /hdd/bi
Not Open Vision, Open PLi maybe?
Destination        = /hdd/fullbackup_et1x000/20190916_0743/et1x000
RECEIVER = GI ET11000 

ls: invalid option -- 'e'

BusyBox v1.29.3 (2019-09-15 13:11:35 UTC) multi-call binary.

 

I understand that this branch is only developing.



Re: BackupSuite #1097 betacentauri

  • PLi® Core member
  • 7,185 posts

+323
Excellent

Posted 16 September 2019 - 06:13

Don’t use thud branch! It’s work in progress.
And if you really want to use it, you should know how to fix it (just look into develop branch ;) )

Edited by betacentauri, 16 September 2019 - 06:13.

Xtrend ET-9200, ET-8000, ET-10000, OpenPliPC on Ubuntu 12.04

Re: BackupSuite #1098 foxbob

  • Senior Member
  • 612 posts

+18
Neutral

Posted 16 September 2019 - 17:12

Now only this error, backup is created, but there is no final log.

Attached Files



Re: BackupSuite #1099 betacentauri

  • PLi® Core member
  • 7,185 posts

+323
Excellent

Posted 16 September 2019 - 17:17

@foxbob: Sorry, it was too early this morning.

 

Please report problems with thud in other (own) thread. Most likely these problems have nothing really to do with the plugin. I guess something has changed in busybox which now makes the problems.


Xtrend ET-9200, ET-8000, ET-10000, OpenPliPC on Ubuntu 12.04

Re: BackupSuite #1100 betacentauri

  • PLi® Core member
  • 7,185 posts

+323
Excellent

Posted 16 September 2019 - 17:52

@Persion Prince: In latest busybox "ls -e" is not supported any longer. It was removed by busybox developers: https://github.com/m...85b31f515ca670b

Can you rewrite the plugin so that -e is not used?


Xtrend ET-9200, ET-8000, ET-10000, OpenPliPC on Ubuntu 12.04


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users