Jump to content


Photo

New general Oscampatch

oscam

  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 christophecvr

  • Senior Member
  • 3,131 posts

+140
Excellent

Posted 14 January 2012 - 18:31

@MiLo or any moderator

Hello, Recently there was a small problem with oscam. This was caused due to a new function added into oscam. There was just a small bug which caused oscam-experimental to be unusable. Since a couple of hours this is solved now with revision 6237.

Oscam is still in full developpement fase. This is why i again modified a couple off things into oscam.

The first modification . The oscam stable is changed to have version 1.10 with autorevision (only stable and needed updates will be done it will remain a stable version)

The second The oscam unstable now becomes A trunk (version 1.20) From which we now it's pretty stable and does work. Actually this has to be considdered as a beta version.
Currently I inserted version trunk (1.20) 6234 . The last before the insertion of the new function which I had running a good time very stable . Also in that version it was ok for the last contra ...

The oscam experimental remains unchanged and does have a lot of upgrades. Can be up to 10 or ... in one day.
It is experimental and yes recent versions may bug completely up to even freeze the whole stb. If you do not know enough about oscam I suggest to use the unstable version, this will normally always work and not bug your stb as it is tested. At the same time it will be pretty up to date .

I as well added the new file oscam.whitelist
That's why in this patch the revison from as well enigma2-plugins..... are changed. Also the change from unstable to 1.20

In this patch also the softcams-enigma2-meta.bb is changed to include again the extra depends. oscam-experimental oscam-stable oscam-unstable
This is needed otherwise the installation will bug due sequence. (when you run bitbake openpli-enigma2-feed)

Would be nice if an administrator would push this patch into openpli.

Thanks

Attached Files



Re: New general Oscampatch #2 christophecvr

  • Senior Member
  • 3,131 posts

+140
Excellent

Posted 14 January 2012 - 19:43

I did a last minute modification.

The unstable revision is now 6233 instead off 6234 as some persons reports problems with 6234 as well. 6233 seems to be ok for all inclusif latest rate limit entso on ....

Attached Files



Re: New general Oscampatch #3 christophecvr

  • Senior Member
  • 3,131 posts

+140
Excellent

Posted 15 January 2012 - 20:40

Hello,

Is there a problem with patch ? I just checked it out with the very last git. And it does work fine.
If allowed I can push it self, There will be in future concerning oscam anyway more changes.

I as well to intend to modifie in time the oscam cs 'as card server only then .

Re: New general Oscampatch #4 MiLo

  • PLi® Core member
  • 14,045 posts

+298
Excellent

Posted 15 January 2012 - 20:49

Took a quick peek, and there are some problems:

- softcampatch.zip ended up in the patch
- "stable" gets a running revision, and "unstable" gets a fixed to 6233, I'd expect the other way around?
Real musicians never die - they just decompose

Re: New general Oscampatch #5 christophecvr

  • Senior Member
  • 3,131 posts

+140
Excellent

Posted 16 January 2012 - 01:16

Took a quick peek, and there are some problems:

- softcampatch.zip ended up in the patch
- "stable" gets a running revision, and "unstable" gets a fixed to 6233, I'd expect the other way around?


Hello,

The stable is tag 1.10, which is a 100 % stable version. This version is not under developpement anymore but on very rare occation a small fix is applied to it then it receive new version number . that's why whe have autorev.

The unstable , Is now also trunk (which is 1.20) But here I put a fixed version number From a revision which has been tested a while and does work good. This actually is needed to follow the latest evolution whit all the changes. It can be considered as a beta version. At the same time it's a good alternatif should a problematic experimental version arise.

The experimental remains like it is, But it may have a revision such as lately we had first whit change of stapi and now on version 6236 there was a big bug due to the add from a new function. (in despit the fact that it was a little error in a single rule from .c file) Then it won't start till even bug a full stb . That's why its called experimental

I will update The unstable version on several occasions with a version offf wich we now it work ok. But it's still to be considered beta.

oeps from zip file I'll correctet it. This happened by the extra change to 6233 for unstable Here the new one.

Attached Files



Re: New general Oscampatch #6 christophecvr

  • Senior Member
  • 3,131 posts

+140
Excellent

Posted 26 January 2012 - 14:38

Hello Still no answer, ?

What's wrong with patch now. ?

Nice to know :wacko:



1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users