Jump to content


Photo

Improved version of blind scan for ET9x00 only

ET9X00

  • Please log in to reply
73 replies to this topic

Re: Improved version of blind scan for ET9x00 only #61 pieterg

  • PLi® Core member
  • 32,766 posts

+245
Excellent

Posted 15 November 2012 - 15:26

you should use the blindscan from the feed, no more need for an external ipk

Re: Improved version of blind scan for ET9x00 only #62 golfdiesel

  • Senior Member
  • 448 posts

+10
Neutral

Posted 23 December 2012 - 09:16

you should use the blindscan from the feed, no more need for an external ipk


For some strange reason blindscan does not show up anywhere in the list when I try to install it on my et9500.

Re: Improved version of blind scan for ET9x00 only #63 Dimitrij

  • PLi® Core member
  • 10,022 posts

+338
Excellent

Posted 23 December 2012 - 09:38

you should use the blindscan from the feed, no more need for an external ipk


For some strange reason blindscan does not show up anywhere in the list when I try to install it on my et9500.

try

GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Solo 4K


Re: Improved version of blind scan for ET9x00 only #64 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 56,274 posts

+691
Excellent

Posted 23 December 2012 - 10:29

An ipk from the forum is not from our feeds???

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: Improved version of blind scan for ET9x00 only #65 Dimitrij

  • PLi® Core member
  • 10,022 posts

+338
Excellent

Posted 23 December 2012 - 11:33

An ipk from the forum is not from our feeds???

I found it here
https://github.com/o...aster/Blindscan
And passed the dependency in file control:
original - Depends: enigma2, virtual/blindscan-dvbs
my version - Depends: enigma2, et-blindscan-dvbs-utils

GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Solo 4K


Re: Improved version of blind scan for ET9x00 only #66 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,247 posts

+158
Excellent

Posted 23 December 2012 - 16:26


An ipk from the forum is not from our feeds???

I found it here
https://github.com/o...aster/Blindscan
And passed the dependency in file control:
original - Depends: enigma2, virtual/blindscan-dvbs
my version - Depends: enigma2, et-blindscan-dvbs-utils

How do you like it?

Re: Improved version of blind scan for ET9x00 only #67 Dimitrij

  • PLi® Core member
  • 10,022 posts

+338
Excellent

Posted 23 December 2012 - 18:03

How do you like it?

I have not changed any byte code in this plugin.
Than you unhappy?
I thought that all of these additions are made to users, and is absolutely free, because of a hobby.
I also made ​​a few plugins and another image using them under another name.
And that cry now?

GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Solo 4K


Re: Improved version of blind scan for ET9x00 only #68 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,247 posts

+158
Excellent

Posted 23 December 2012 - 19:27


How do you like it?

I have not changed any byte code in this plugin.
Than you unhappy?

Not at all. Was just asking because it was me that rewrote it with those features.

Re: Improved version of blind scan for ET9x00 only #69 Robinson

  • Senior Member
  • 2,616 posts

+30
Good

Posted 27 February 2013 - 23:02

Hi,
After getting a used ET9000, I found there is no blindscan installed on the box? Or am I blind (excuse the pun)? Where do I look for it in the menu?
Also, after readinf this therad, I can see there are 2 versions of blindscan. Do they both work correctly on motorized installation?
I am a little confused but I would love to give it a try.

you should use the blindscan from the feed, no more need for an external ipk

I understand it is one of the two versions described in this topic? Whose?
Is it possible to install the other one too so that I could compare them and use the one that suits me better?

ET9000, OpenPLi 4.0, 13E, 19E

HD51, OpenPLi 6.2, 75E - 30W


Re: Improved version of blind scan for ET9x00 only #70 Robinson

  • Senior Member
  • 2,616 posts

+30
Good

Posted 28 February 2013 - 14:13

I have installed the one from the feed (OpenPLi 3.0) but it does not seem to show up anywhere in the menu.
I guess I will try the file attached by Dima73 above.
Or is it only for 2.1?

ET9000, OpenPLi 4.0, 13E, 19E

HD51, OpenPLi 6.2, 75E - 30W


Re: Improved version of blind scan for ET9x00 only #71 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 56,274 posts

+691
Excellent

Posted 28 February 2013 - 15:22

In the manual scan menu you can select for blindscan....

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: Improved version of blind scan for ET9x00 only #72 Dimitrij

  • PLi® Core member
  • 10,022 posts

+338
Excellent

Posted 28 February 2013 - 15:59

def BlindscanSetup(menuid, **kwargs):
if menuid == "scan":
return [(_("Blind Scan"), main, "blindscan", None)]

GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Solo 4K


Re: Improved version of blind scan for ET9x00 only #73 Robinson

  • Senior Member
  • 2,616 posts

+30
Good

Posted 28 February 2013 - 23:52


I found it here
https://github.com/o...aster/Blindscan
And passed the dependency in file control:
original - Depends: enigma2, virtual/blindscan-dvbs
my version - Depends: enigma2, et-blindscan-dvbs-utils

How do you like it?

OK, so this is your version, Huevos?
Because, as I understand, there is also another one - by rhinoceros.
Would you still work on it if any bugs were to be found or any improvements suggested?

ET9000, OpenPLi 4.0, 13E, 19E

HD51, OpenPLi 6.2, 75E - 30W


Re: Improved version of blind scan for ET9x00 only #74 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,247 posts

+158
Excellent

Posted 1 March 2013 - 10:56

Would you still work on it if any bugs were to be found or any improvements suggested?

Bugs that are not caused by hardware or drivers, yes of course. Improvements/ideas are open to discussion.



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users