Jump to content


Photo

merge requests for PLi's git


  • Please log in to reply
1748 replies to this topic

Re: merge requests for PLi's git #961 SpaceRat

  • Senior Member
  • 1,030 posts

+65
Good

Posted 30 November 2016 - 20:11

I couldn't care less *vbeg*

As I said, it has been fixed in 1.1 and "we" (That actually means Jörg Bleyel) even implemented a feature request that was almost 2 yrs old:
OWIF 1.1 will not only hide those fillers within the station list, you can even create them inside the Bouquet Editor!

Edited by SpaceRat, 30 November 2016 - 20:12.

1st box: Vu+ Ultimo 4k 4xDVB-S2 FBC / 2xDVB-C / 1.8 TB HDD / OpenATV 6.2
2nd box: Gigablue Quad 4k 2xDVB-S2 FBC / 2xDVB-C / 1.8 TB HDD / OpenATV 6.2
testing boxes: Vu+ Duo² + AX Quadbox HD2400 + 2x Vu+ Solo² + Octagon SF4008
Sats & Pay-TV: Astra 19.2°E + Hotbird 13°E with Redlight / SCT HD / SES Astra HD- / Sky V14 / 4th empire propaganda TV
Card-Server: Raspberry Pi + IPv6-capable oscam
Router: Linksys WRT1900ACS w/ LEDE + Fritz!Box 7390

Re: merge requests for PLi's git #962 Persian Prince

  • Senior Member
  • 1,982 posts

+247
Excellent

Posted 3 December 2016 - 11:21

Still waiting : "Delete png meta data for libpng >=1.6.x iCCP chunk warning"

 

"E2OpenPlugins"

 

https://github.com/E...Password/pull/2

https://github.com/E...poItalia/pull/2

https://github.com/E...eoItalia/pull/2

https://github.com/E...n-XPower/pull/5

https://github.com/E...urScreen/pull/4

https://github.com/E...nAirPlay/pull/7

https://github.com/E...nmpAgent/pull/3

https://github.com/E...eoViewer/pull/4

https://github.com/E...logClock/pull/2

https://github.com/E...SetPicon/pull/3

https://github.com/E...cheFlush/pull/3

https://github.com/E...ShutDown/pull/8

https://github.com/E...HetWeer/pull/17

https://github.com/E...nterface/pull/3

https://github.com/E...rossEPG/pull/41

https://github.com/E...-Foreca/pull/34

https://github.com/E...toBackup/pull/7

https://github.com/E...ienradar/pull/1

 

"littlesat"

 

https://github.com/l...-PLiHD/pull/476

 

"ims21"

 

https://github.com/i...hBouquet/pull/2


Open Vision sources: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #963 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,187 posts

+699
Excellent

Posted 3 December 2016 - 11:45

This was a bit too much... please let me know when I forget one... ;)


WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #964 SpaceRat

  • Senior Member
  • 1,030 posts

+65
Good

Posted 8 December 2016 - 04:30

You might want to have a look at these two commits:
https://github.com/o...29a47939c4bfb7d
https://github.com/o...7524f6b1033c5af

betacentauri took (one of) the rifle(s) out of some users hands :)

I consider this an important security fix:
Wikipedia: Mirai (Malware)
Live monitoring of Mirai botnet attacks
October 2016: Blame the Internet of Things for Destroying the Internet Today (Made github, Twitter, Netflix unreachable for hours)
November 2016: Mirai botnet targets Deutsche Telekom routers in global cyberattack (This attack took nearly one million of them down!)

Please be aware that E2 boxes are already one of the known targets of Mirai:
Mirai botnet scanner code example code line:
add_auth_entry("\x50\x4D\x4D\x56", "\x46\x50\x47\x43\x4F\x40\x4D\x5A", 1);              // root     dreambox
Although this isn't OpenPLi's or any oe-a's image's default password, it's clear that Mirai is aware of our boxes.

We can't leave the decision about shooting their feet to the user in this case, as such botnets are a treat to the internet as a whole.

Edited by SpaceRat, 8 December 2016 - 04:31.

1st box: Vu+ Ultimo 4k 4xDVB-S2 FBC / 2xDVB-C / 1.8 TB HDD / OpenATV 6.2
2nd box: Gigablue Quad 4k 2xDVB-S2 FBC / 2xDVB-C / 1.8 TB HDD / OpenATV 6.2
testing boxes: Vu+ Duo² + AX Quadbox HD2400 + 2x Vu+ Solo² + Octagon SF4008
Sats & Pay-TV: Astra 19.2°E + Hotbird 13°E with Redlight / SCT HD / SES Astra HD- / Sky V14 / 4th empire propaganda TV
Card-Server: Raspberry Pi + IPv6-capable oscam
Router: Linksys WRT1900ACS w/ LEDE + Fritz!Box 7390

Re: merge requests for PLi's git #965 peteru

  • Senior Member
  • 36 posts

+5
Neutral

Posted 8 December 2016 - 05:57

Improving security is always a good idea, but I wonder if patching BusyBox telnet server is the right angle of attack.

 

I would think that a system wide configuration using ipchains/iptables would be more sensible. It would work with any telnet server and the same set of rules can be applied to multiple services.


"Beauty lies in the hands of the beer holder."

 


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #966 betacentauri

  • PLi® Core member
  • 7,185 posts

+323
Excellent

Posted 8 December 2016 - 08:42

iptables need afaik adaptions in the kernel config. Kernel config changes are always dangerous because afterwards box driver maybe cannot be loaded anymore.
I personally never heard that somebody managed it to get it running.
Xtrend ET-9200, ET-8000, ET-10000, OpenPliPC on Ubuntu 12.04

Re: merge requests for PLi's git #967 peteru

  • Senior Member
  • 36 posts

+5
Neutral

Posted 8 December 2016 - 13:06

My experience is mainly with ini hardware and Beyonwiz distro. With that combination there are no issues changing kernel config, but there is no need, since all the required features are already enabled. OpenPLi may be more limited in terms of kernel features, but it should be possible to use the dvb driver with a kernel that has more modules enabled.

 

By all means, use whatever method is best for OpenPLi. At least we now both know that you are aware of different methods and that you have a reason for choosing the approach you have taken.

 

For maximum flexibility, the patch that restricts the connections to private or local networks would be selectable at runtime with a command line switch.


"Beauty lies in the hands of the beer holder."

 


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #968 SpaceRat

  • Senior Member
  • 1,030 posts

+65
Good

Posted 8 December 2016 - 19:37

For maximum flexibility, the patch that restricts the connections to private or local networks would be selectable at runtime with a command line switch.

Then you can as well keep it outside.
Those who desperately want to open Telnet would quickly find "Howto-shoot-your-feet"-Tutorials for putting the command line switch.

Simply no excuse/reason exists for opening telnet to the outside world.
Tests on honeypots have proven that it only takes minute(s) before attacks come in.

The patch is addressed at those users that are reluctant to learn how to create a key pair for ssh, as opening telnet is sooooo much easier.
Tutorials on how to manually downgrade busybox (Without f*cking up the box on the way) would be harder than those for key pair creation for ssh.

I really hoped that OpenPLi could skip the endless discussion in such an obvious case.
1st box: Vu+ Ultimo 4k 4xDVB-S2 FBC / 2xDVB-C / 1.8 TB HDD / OpenATV 6.2
2nd box: Gigablue Quad 4k 2xDVB-S2 FBC / 2xDVB-C / 1.8 TB HDD / OpenATV 6.2
testing boxes: Vu+ Duo² + AX Quadbox HD2400 + 2x Vu+ Solo² + Octagon SF4008
Sats & Pay-TV: Astra 19.2°E + Hotbird 13°E with Redlight / SCT HD / SES Astra HD- / Sky V14 / 4th empire propaganda TV
Card-Server: Raspberry Pi + IPv6-capable oscam
Router: Linksys WRT1900ACS w/ LEDE + Fritz!Box 7390

Re: merge requests for PLi's git #969 MastaG

  • Senior Member
  • 1,531 posts

+118
Excellent

Posted 9 December 2016 - 09:39

I see similar matters have been taken for the webif.

If I now tunnel directly trough my router to the openwebif I'm not allowed anymore.

I now create two tunnels, the second (to the receiver) pointing to localhost :)

 

I'm all for security, great job!



Re: merge requests for PLi's git #970 Persian Prince

  • Senior Member
  • 1,982 posts

+247
Excellent

Posted 10 December 2016 - 11:49

"openpli"

 

https://github.com/O...e-core/pull/144

 

"E2OpenPlugins"

 

https://github.com/E...nterface/pull/3

 

"ims21"

 

https://github.com/i...hBouquet/pull/2


Open Vision sources: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #971 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,552 posts

+1,813
Excellent

Posted 10 December 2016 - 12:43

E2OpenPlugins merged.


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #972 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,187 posts

+699
Excellent

Posted 10 December 2016 - 12:45

OpenPLi Merged by Littlesat...


WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #973 Abu Baniaz

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 2,501 posts

+64
Good

Posted 22 December 2016 - 21:25

Can someone cherry pick this in please? Allows composition of recording filenames to be based on the event name.

https://github.com/O...2f7623c1037aa80

Edited by Abu Baniaz, 22 December 2016 - 21:26.


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #974 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,969 posts

+542
Excellent

Posted 25 December 2016 - 13:34

Can you explain what it does?


* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #975 SpaceRat

  • Senior Member
  • 1,030 posts

+65
Good

Posted 25 December 2016 - 14:40

By looking at the code for 3 sec:
It re-orders the filename components
from
1. Date
2. Station
3. Event Name
to
1. Event name
2. Date
3. Station
1st box: Vu+ Ultimo 4k 4xDVB-S2 FBC / 2xDVB-C / 1.8 TB HDD / OpenATV 6.2
2nd box: Gigablue Quad 4k 2xDVB-S2 FBC / 2xDVB-C / 1.8 TB HDD / OpenATV 6.2
testing boxes: Vu+ Duo² + AX Quadbox HD2400 + 2x Vu+ Solo² + Octagon SF4008
Sats & Pay-TV: Astra 19.2°E + Hotbird 13°E with Redlight / SCT HD / SES Astra HD- / Sky V14 / 4th empire propaganda TV
Card-Server: Raspberry Pi + IPv6-capable oscam
Router: Linksys WRT1900ACS w/ LEDE + Fritz!Box 7390

Re: merge requests for PLi's git #976 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,187 posts

+699
Excellent

Posted 25 December 2016 - 15:28

Then offer us a patch on our github... ;) this one is openvix...

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #977 SpaceRat

  • Senior Member
  • 1,030 posts

+65
Good

Posted 25 December 2016 - 16:18

I was only explaining ...
I don't care about this change ... I bet it even breaks diplaying recordings in EMC and other plugins that rely on the way recordings are labelled now.
1st box: Vu+ Ultimo 4k 4xDVB-S2 FBC / 2xDVB-C / 1.8 TB HDD / OpenATV 6.2
2nd box: Gigablue Quad 4k 2xDVB-S2 FBC / 2xDVB-C / 1.8 TB HDD / OpenATV 6.2
testing boxes: Vu+ Duo² + AX Quadbox HD2400 + 2x Vu+ Solo² + Octagon SF4008
Sats & Pay-TV: Astra 19.2°E + Hotbird 13°E with Redlight / SCT HD / SES Astra HD- / Sky V14 / 4th empire propaganda TV
Card-Server: Raspberry Pi + IPv6-capable oscam
Router: Linksys WRT1900ACS w/ LEDE + Fritz!Box 7390

Re: merge requests for PLi's git #978 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,187 posts

+699
Excellent

Posted 25 December 2016 - 16:47

I bet it even breaks diplaying recordings in EMC and other plugins that rely on the way recordings are labelled now. 

->

I bet the same... ;)


WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #979 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,552 posts

+1,813
Excellent

Posted 25 December 2016 - 17:24

That happens when you hardcode anything. Eventually it will break. Question is, who's problem is that? ;)


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #980 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,187 posts

+699
Excellent

Posted 25 December 2016 - 17:31

But what real advantage should it give when the names of recordings are changed, while old recordings stay the same??


WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W



2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users