342 replies to this topic

[MiLo]

A softcam not pays royalties for different CAS systems... so these kind of software who emulates a conditional access system are quite illegal too.

If you compile the CAM yourself, in the privacy of your own home, you're safe. At least, in European countries you cannot be charged (or sued) for patent infringement as an individual. Legislation in other countries is probably similar on that topic.

[angelofsky1980]

 

A softcam not pays royalties for different CAS systems... so these kind of software who emulates a conditional access system are quite illegal too.

If you compile the CAM yourself, in the privacy of your own home, you're safe. At least, in European countries you cannot be charged (or sued) for patent infringement as an individual. Legislation in other countries is probably similar on that topic.

 

Thanks for this info.

 

Conax is royalty free, so a Conax-only oscam would be perfectly legal ...

Uhm .... do you have some docs about it? I don't understand why Vu+ has moved their default CAS from Conax to XCrypt some years ago if Conax CAS is free and they don't need to pay licenses to use.

[Proximator]

“The Orion Express results reconfirm Conax’ open partnering policy for royalty-free client devices supporting a wide range of security-evaluated set-top-boxes. Conax enables pay-tv operators to provide a highly attractive consumer offering including freedom of choice and price range, without compromising security,” confirms Larisa Makarovskaya, Director Area Sales, Conax Russia,

http://www.conax.com/ru/news/conax-security-solution-contributes-to-significant-subscriber-growth-of-orion-express-dth-platforms/

[Proximator]

Royalty-free,value-enhanced

 

Conax works closely with a wide range of STB manufacturer partners to build in extra Conax-enhanced ecurity at the design stage. We do not charge royalty fees to STB manufacturers for embedding Conax content security. This lowers STB costs by as much as 15%.

http://www.conax.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Conax_Brochure.pdf

[gamingris]

hello,

I have un new sunray se solo 3 from one week

I am leaving in France

Its impossible to read fransat

I have a module from fransat neotion CI+ 1.3

I receiced this message on the  TV screen

 

Le module fransat est réservé pour une utilisation avec un équipement CI + exclusivement

 

This means that tne common interface on the sunray se solo 3 is not CI +

 

What can i do

Thank you

[MiLo]

You have two choices here:
1. Cancel your subscription.
2. Buy a TV or settop with a CI+ interface. (hint: Open source settop boxes will never get CI+ certification)

[SpaceRat]

The third option:

 

Use an image with CI+ support, e.g. OpenATV or VTi.

[littlesat]

But that image is due to this not in line with our and dmm's gpl license!

When I make a mistake here then please/clarify and offer us a patch or the required ipk's...

Edited by littlesat, 5 August 2015 - 17:42.

[gamingris]

The third option:

 

Use an image with CI+ support, e.g. OpenATV or VTi.

tank you

but it is difficult for me to understand. Can I have more details?

[malakudi]

Your box is a VU+ Solo SE clone. Clones are not supported here.

 

CI+ support on other images violates GPL, all those images are illegal.

[jeffxxl]

Ci + module does it work only with VTI Vu dua 2, Solo 2, Solo se ?

Does it work with the original device only ? because I intend to buy Dua 2 merely because Ci plus works with Vti image. Am I right? please help

[WanWizard]

Ask VTI?

[Erik Slagter]

It should just work. Problems?

[Orkf]

So, OpenHDF and OpenATV supported Cl+. End OpenPLI ?

[littlesat]

At least openatv enounced thet they did stop support it...

[SpaceRat]

English suxx for being very unclear ...

The OpenATV team does not provide support (service) for CI+ any longer, but the files needed for the boxes to technically support (implement) CI+ on the boxes simply can't be pulled (revoked) from old installations and there is nothing we can do if any 3rd party finds ways to extract them there and puts them on current images too.

[littlesat]

So they stop the support but 'silently' they give a hint how to continue support... 

Edited by littlesat, 14 March 2017 - 14:21.

[Taapat]

The OpenATV team does not provide support (service) for CI+ any longer

 

Really?

Why you are using a 0001-add-vu-ciplus-support-12102016.patch and own libenigma_dvb_cix_mipsel library if not provide support for CI+ any longer?

Package: enigma2
Version: 5.3+git23711+66ab633-r4
Source: git://github.com/openatv/enigma2.git;protocol=git file://tuxbox_fix_DVB_API_VERSION_check_for_gcc5.patch file://0001-add-vu-ciplus-support-12102016.patch file://libenigma_dvb_cix_mipsel.a
Filename: enigma2_5.3+git23711+66ab633-r4_vusolo2.ipk

[Orkf]

And ani Team may throw off any of the addons (plugin) to Net. And сreate a connection for this in the firmware.

[Orkf]

Cl+ support Is needed. And in OpenPLI notably. Very lacking this functional.