Are there still people that use motorised installations ?
Re: Are there still people that use motorised installations ? #121
Re: Are there still people that use motorised installations ? #122
Posted 3 March 2012 - 23:00
Ok I the I think the message should be more informative. about these risk. I'll think of something and include that in your patch.Well, there is no other risk than that you may loose the positions you already memorised. That's all. Anyway, most semi-professional rotors do not implement this command in any case, so nothing would happen. Worst case is that it is implemented wrongly or that there is a bug in the code or the way it is transmitted by SEC to the rotor. Again that means loss of data or wrong data in the position memory. Nothing catastrophic, but I spent time to finetune some 40+ satellites and I do not want to do that all over again.
@rhinoceras: what are the risk with the recalculate option? Can it destroy the motor?
The message now only asks for confirmation to recalc. But maybe the message should be more informative about the consequences of. recalcs.
You're not into git yet to generate formatted git patches? If not maybe you can specify a proper message and I'll integrate it into the patch and commit it...
Re: Are there still people that use motorised installations ? #123
Posted 3 March 2012 - 23:05
When there is more than 1 tuner with a rotor the user is required to select the tuner for which he/she wants to use the setup for before the setup is entered, so there should never be any ambiguity. This part of the logic was always there and has not been changed by me.@rhinoceros
And if the user has two rotor (motor)?
What if ...
It can be read as a number of the tuner at the opening of the plug.
P.S.However, I do not understand this.
"Het enige wat we leren van de geschiedenis is dat we niets leren van geschiedenis.", Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, 1831 †
Re: Are there still people that use motorised installations ? #124
Posted 3 March 2012 - 23:10
That's ok. But again, perhaps I overemphasized the risk. There should be no danger for the hardware. In the most extreme case, if all goes wrong, the rotor might hit the limits, soft or hard, but the installation should be able to handle that.Ok I the I think the message should be more informative. about these risk. I'll think of something and include that in your patch.
"Het enige wat we leren van de geschiedenis is dat we niets leren van geschiedenis.", Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, 1831 †
Re: Are there still people that use motorised installations ? #125
Posted 3 March 2012 - 23:14
One question.
When the rotor moves from one position to another, a satellite icon is displayed along with "from" and "goto" positions. This is a very nice feature!
However, the time counting down (I assume it shows approx. when the dish arrives at "goto" position.) seems to be totally wrong. For example, moving from 13E to 28E it estimated to take some 16-17 seconds (I don't remember exactly.) but in fact it took only about 5 seconds.
Anyway, great job! Thanks.
The movement speed is based on defautl rotation speeds. These may differ per rotor.
If I'm right the new positionersetup plugin by rhinoceros allow to define the angular rotation speed. I guess it
would be possible to use these values to improve the expected rotation time.
Maybe Dima73 is already looking into this :-)
Re: Are there still people that use motorised installations ? #126
Posted 4 March 2012 - 10:05
For the willing and daring. Here is a version with support for the (re-)calculate command since this question keeps coming up now and then.
WARNING: THE (RE-)CALCULATE COMMAND IS UNTESTED BY ME. I am not willing to risk this with my own rotor setup. There is a confirmation messagebox before the (re-)calculation starts, so inadvertent button presses should do no harm.
Apart from this, there are minor cosmetic improvements.
Since the repo is not (yet) updated it seems with the patch in post #98, the diff included here is cumulative, i.e. it includes that patch.
After update to latest pli experimental image the recalculate-command works fine for me now.
Great work, thank you
Regards, Goedi
Re: Are there still people that use motorised installations ? #127
Posted 4 March 2012 - 13:12
Thanks, I saw you updated the repo. One minor comment, though. There is a typo: "imay". Then "memorized" is U.S. spelling. I normally use U.K. spelling which would read "memorised". Don't know which standard is used in PLi ...
The text "and finetunes" is not really English. Perhaps you could say "and fine-tuning". Thanks for your help.
"Het enige wat we leren van de geschiedenis is dat we niets leren van geschiedenis.", Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, 1831 †
Re: Are there still people that use motorised installations ? #128
Posted 7 March 2012 - 14:35
"Memorized" is not just US spelling. It is the prefered spelling of the OED and you can't get more British than that. OED prefers the "z" because when the word is pronunced it is obviously a "z" sound.Then "memorized" is U.S. spelling. I normally use U.K. spelling which would read "memorised".
Anyway I've had a look at the plugin, which looks really good, but I just have a couple of points.
First USALS (GotoX) and DiSEqC 1.2 (go to position) controls are mixed up on the same screen. Could you not split the screen with a line and have one above and one below?
The GotoX position you can move left/right across the numbers (the angular position) but you can't actually edit them.
The "fine movement" doesn't move my USALS motor at all but does control my V-box.
With step size you are overlooking how an actuator works. They don't move the dish in a linear fashion, for example mine is 14 steps per degree at 57E and 4 steps per degree at 58W. And rate of turn is not related to voltage when using a positioner either.
Lastly "search east" and "move east" should be on the left, and "search west" and "move west" should be on the right. That would be much more intuitive. The way it is right now, if you press the button on the left (west) the dish moves right, and vice versa. Can you imagine a car where you had to turn the steering wheel to the right if you want to turn left (pretty confusing).
Re: Are there still people that use motorised installations ? #129
Posted 7 March 2012 - 22:54
Because i got a building in front of it now, so cannot receive anymore. It's as new (5 months old), see signature.
Location is Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
PM me if interested.
Edited by J3r03n5ky, 7 March 2012 - 22:55.
Dreambox Dm8000 with all hardware addons donated to OpenPli. No interests anymore in policy of CanalDigitaal / M7 group and now-a-days channel encryption (like CI+ / HD+).
Good luck Enigma2 / OpenPli, it was fun with Sky Movies and so on, collected a nice collection of movies. Now back to basic boring lineair TV with KPN iTV (VDSL2 pair bonding 219 / 63 Mbps).
The VDSL pair bonding is excellent for... torrents to NAS in higher quality then HDTV (Like Dolby-TrueHD or DTS-Master-Audio soundquality )
Re: Are there still people that use motorised installations ? #130
Re: Are there still people that use motorised installations ? #131
Re: Are there still people that use motorised installations ? #132
Re: Are there still people that use motorised installations ? #133
Posted 1 April 2012 - 11:53
ive installed the new positoner setup but i am still having trouble moving the dish manually.. when i enter the positoner setup and manually move the dish to get a better signal it finds the signal and locks it but when i exit i find that the dish has moved again and retrieved the old crappy signal or no signal in most cases. I am just wondering if i missed anything? any help would be appreciated.
thanks
raj
Re: Are there still people that use motorised installations ? #134
Re: Are there still people that use motorised installations ? #135
Re: Are there still people that use motorised installations ? #136
Re: Are there still people that use motorised installations ? #137
Posted 1 April 2012 - 17:34
Re: Are there still people that use motorised installations ? #138
Posted 1 April 2012 - 17:47
Re: Are there still people that use motorised installations ? #139
Posted 1 April 2012 - 18:09
Re: Are there still people that use motorised installations ? #140
7 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 7 guests, 0 anonymous users