Huevos

Right now with the variables that are available to Python I can't see another way to do it.

 

Simplified it a bit so the poll is just watching tuner lock once a second.

 

It is there for anyone that wants it. Not trying to force it on anyone.

 

https://github.com/H...dd.lock-monitor

 

Thanks for your input.

That is exactly the challenge.... (to do it without pressing a button).

Got that working. Pity it is not possible using current enigma code.

 

Littlesat this is already done in the plugin I mentioned. When you set up the plugin there are configtext fields for ftp username and password. Ftp is used for copying the bouquets and epg.

OpenViX image has similar embeded directly in the image. When enabled the local tuners are disabled and the box becomes a streaming client.

 

 

So e2 needs to handle multiple same tsid/onid

No, because the transponder is identical so no point. I made a plugin that only scans the strong one... but that's a different story.

 

I just wondered why PLi never bothered to maintain these files, at least for major cities.

 

Actually the assumption that the transponder is identical is wrong.

 

In Italy DVB-T, local RAI3 versions have the same service reference. So you can only get one using enigma2

 

More info here (in Italian):

http://www.vuplus-co...-diversi.14509/

 

Same in Holland. The local channel is inserted for each transmitter individually even though the TSID is the same. Anyway that is the way the broadcaster intends it to be. Any other system would break the LCNs they transmit.

DVB-T2 FEC modes 3/5 and 4/5 are missing. They are part of the DVB-T2 standard and used in some countries (e.g. Sweden/Denmark). Can they be added?

 

https://github.com/O...rms.h#L106-L108

 

https://en.wikipedia...nces_with_DVB-T

Which commit is the one incompatible with the duo2?

According to delsys the DVB-S FBC PnP tuners for the Ultimo/Uno 4K are not S2X capable and cannot open multistream.

 

As delsys is used to determine if multistream is possible this tuner will not be selected for multistream services even if the problem is just delsys giving the wrong information.

Octagon is a great receiver if you don't need all those tuners.

Unicable circular LNB exist?

No!

https://github.com/H...19b01ca78ede731

 

 

 

The problem is that it is working right now... Only in the UI part "something" needs to be adapted and to do it properly it is relatively a lot of work as the UI was not designed for these kind of multi type of tuners with two modes together.... And this is really "hammering"

 

[...]

 

Note all cpp stuff is ready (and therefore the tuner can tune when you put it afterwards in DVB-S mode).... so it needs a lot of python (re)coding... As far I know practically only in NimManager.py and SatConfig.py... (and I also perfer to wait for the JESS/unicalbe-II integration as this need also big changes in these two fOails...)

 

Or just a dirty hack, without any guidance. Oh and no changes in NimManager or SatConfig. I can leave that to the professionals

 

 

 

All this stress just to display an unnecessary dot in the user interface.

- defaultCab["frequency"] = frontendData.get("frequency", 0) / 1000
+ defaultCab["frequency"] = frontendData.get("frequency", 0)

- self.scan_cab.frequency = ConfigFloat(default = [defaultCab["frequency"], 0], limits = [(50, 999), (0,999)])
+ self.scan_cab.frequency = ConfigFloat(default = [defaultCab["frequency"]/1000, defaultCab["frequency"]%1000], limits = [(50, 999), (0,999)])

Yes, ABM works in PLi. And it is in the PLi feeds.

 

TerrestrialScan might need minor tweaks to the menu placing and setup screen, but apart from that should be compatible with PLi. The scan part is in a separate .py file and I would expect that to work in PLi without any mods.

 

I've got no objection to that plugin being used by the OpenPLi team... otherwise I wouldn't have started this thread suggesting it.

 

L

 

When I have time I can include the bb file and create the dependency so it actually gets built. But I'm afraid someone will have to remind me, because this is a subject (bouquets-creating plugins) I frankly couldn't care less about

 

A lot effort has been made by a number of people to help an OpenPLi user that want's to use this plugin. Is it a lot to ask that the OpenPLi team put in the last 1% of effort needed to finish the job?