buyukbang

I was having same problem and deleting caids from ci0.xml and ci1.xml just didn't worked for me. I found a weird solutions though :S

 

Caid ID that Conax card of cable provider (Turksat Cable): 0xb00 (also defined in oscam.server as caid=0B00 )

Caid ID CI Module for satellite package provider (DSmart): 0xb00 (Module is inserted in CI 0 Slot)

 

I just wrote both in the both ci0.xml as given below. Then restarted enigma2 and viola! Now I can switch all channels from both providers without any problem. I can't explain the root cause of the problem, but I would be more than happy to help if someone wants to dig deeper.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<ci>
	<slot>
		<id>0</id>
		<caid id="0x92b" />
		<caid id="0xb00" />
	</slot>
</ci>

Hi guys,

 

May be you noticed, new and blazing fast Vu+ Solo2 devices suffer a bug that causes CI modules cannot initiate high bitrate support properly after boot, reboot or GUI (Enigma) restart.

 

I wrote "VU+ Solo2 CI High Bitrate Fix" plugin to fix this problem. This plugin supports both OE 1.6 and OE 2.0 and hopefully covers all CI modules. As always, I wrote and test the plugin on the latest PLi image!

 

You can always visit my blog for the original download link, future updates and my other E2 plugins:
http://buyukbang.blogspot.com

I also attached current version of the plugin to this post.

 

Wish you enjoy it !

@Mods, could you please put this file to PLi Solo2 feeds? Thanks !!!

Buyukbang Panel v1.3.2 is released! Please see above menu for details and download link.

Version History:

v1.3.2:
- Bug fix: Copy EPG process and Scheduler work at wrong time or doesn't work at all when the box has invalid date/time (1970) at boot and time update via DVB/NTP delays.
- Bug fix: Scheduled Copy EPG doesn't work when Periodic Copy EPG is activated.
- Bug fix: Buyukbang Panel icon on Plugin Browser is not shown on nonPLi based images.
- Bug fix: Cannot install ipk file on Dreambox OE2 Experimental Image with an warning error.


Thanks to our friends for the beta tests. They made this release as a final stable release for 1.3.x series introducing OE1.6/OE2.0 dual base support.

VU+: sistem.prof. ve Korsan
Dreambox: Kef14 ve veyselcan
Azbox: Alanzo

Erik,

It's really hard to understand your ignorance on understanding our demands to have "same picture" in enigma as in the original firmwares of the STB's mentioned on the topic title. It's just simple as that and It's also cristal clear that I do not as anything from broadcom. We have other SoC alternatives. I do not mind neither the SoC brand nor the STB brand. I just want one E2 box.

Please read carefully what I wrote in my previous post: "I'm sure that the new broadcom chipsets will have more muscles in multimedia support, user interface, etc but also completely hopeIess when it comes to PQ."

SD's are extreme examples, however HD's are also better on the mentioned boxes.

The way you participate in this thread is just trying to shut all demanding mouths up, nothing else.

Sorry mate, I'm sure that the new broadcom chipsets will have more muscles in multimedia support, user interface, etc but also completely hopeIess when it comes to PQ. I found no trace about a PQ enhancement in this white paper. I think they are concentrated on other areas as before and not interested in fighting with other SoC companies for the videophile customers.

I hardly think you can mention videophile and SD in the same context...

You're asking broadcom to create something which isn't there. Broadcom concentrates on transparent video passthrough, which, for the true "videohpile" is the absolute goal. And I think they're doing a great job in that area.

Maybe some other hardware manufacturer steps into the niche of SD postprocessing and launches a chip for that purpose to be inserted into the digital video stream and do some processing on it. Actually I like that concept a lot better then the thought of my crystal clear HD video being mangled without my permission to do so.

Okay, lets say it post processing, that's okay for me. I'm just interested in enjoying the output image in my E2 box, any solution would be appreciated for that.

I've hopes on OpenPLi PC about this topic, and belive it's one of the options since it's a way flexible to play settings on PC. But I beleive without OpenPLi developers support and periodic releases, It'll take years to have a complete and stable PC image. AFAIK, none of the PLi developers are interested in that.

Other solutions are supporting Azbox, katherin officially, then creating a plugin to play with enhanced Video properties. But again none of the PLi developers are interested in that.

The last solution that's come to my mind is, as I said in my previous post, we should just wait until a company could notice this gap in STB world and offers a solution for what we asks.

If you and others start calling "picture quality" "post processing level of sd material", then I think we can talk.

Like WanWizard says, it may very well be that the sigma SoC's have more/other options for post processing of sd material. But then still, that is hardware, there is no driver that can implement certain post processing on hardware that doesn't have it, no matter if the drivers are open or closed.

Sorry mate, I'm sure that the new broadcom chipsets will have more muscles in multimedia support, user interface, etc but also completely hopeIess when it comes to PQ. I found no trace about a PQ enhancement in this white paper. I think they are concentrated on other areas as before and not interested in fighting with other SoC companies for the videophile customers.

http://files.shareho...adband_News.pdf - coming our way...

I think all concludes the same point: There can be a difference but how can you choose one as the better one between the resulting pictures of different SoC's. Right ?

Then I can give you thousands of PQ sensive people as the reference. Please just do a simple google for that. People really like the resulting pictures of Sigma and STi. It's really cruel just to claim this as a mass dreaming/illusion.

As I wrote in my first message, I'm an e2 and Pli fun and switching to boxes without e2 is not an option to me. My aim is to be able to have an option that combines PQ of the boxes with STi and Sigma (with the original firmwares and drivers) on e2 boxes. You call it as perception and that's perfectly okay for me. But ignoring perception of all these videophiles is not a solution for the topic. May be a company could notice this gap in STB world and offers a solution for what we asks, then this topic will reach its goal.

Any feature you will enable will alter the signal, and while you might percieve it as being a better picture, technically it is altered from the original. Which perhaps means that the original input signal wasn't too good, so the SoC could visually improve something. Fine. But that has nothing to do with picture quality, but with your personal perception of what is better...

Funny you are using the term upscaling by the way. If your tv has 1920 by 1080 pixels and the original material is SD, it has to be scaled somewhere. If not, you'd have a very small picture... So it's scaled by the broadcaster, in the stb or in the television. What flavour exactly do you call "upscaling" and why would one be better than another, exactly?

Buyukbang panel has this functionality:

http://openpli.org/f...nique-features/

I'm seriously planning to sell my STB and use openPLiPC for every day usage

Hi all,

I just released Buyukbang Panel plugin for Enigma2. I tried to include only unique features that is not provided by other plugins or panels. Visit my blog for details about the features, screenshots and updated download links:

http://buyukbang.blogspot.com

I summarized the feature descriptions below:

Copy EPG: Copies EPG data from source channels to the same channels without EPG data on other satellites or packages. Manuel, autuomatic, scheduled or periodic working modes are implemented.

Link EPG: Links EPG data source channels to the same channels without EPG data on other satellites or packages. Link EPG does not replicate EPG data on RAM and just link it dynamically.

Filter EPG: Filters out unwanted EPG broadcasts like Current and Next. You can add/remove filtered EPG titles from the user interface. This feature replaces my "EPG Current/Next Fix" plugin.

Fix EPG Encoding: Fixes EPG encoding problems by querying Kingofsat for selected language and adding missing entries to encoding.conf at startup once a day.

Hide Zap Errors: Hides zap errors displayed on the screen after switching to wrongly modified / broken channels. (Already implemented on PLi, this is just for other images)

Startup to Standby: Takes STB to standby on startup. Differs from statuptostandby plugin by providing an option to exclude enigma2 restarts.
Scheduler: Performs scheduled restart, reboot, shutdown and standby operations. You can choose time and days of week for the schedule from the user interface.

Any help please ?

Hi all VU+ friends,

VTuner is an application that shares tuner of enigma2 STB with PC. This is a complete sharing that simulating tuner on the linux side with a virtual driver So with that virtual tuner, you can do everything that you can do with a physical tuner attached to your system: For example. You can run all DVB and VDR applications like MythTV, you can use offline download features of DVB cards .... Note that this is not a simple streaming that is dependent on E2, this is completely a full DVB card similator that executes independent from E2.

There is two separate vtuner executables:
1- vtunerd: Server application that is executed on STB: vtunerd shares tuner of the STB.
2- vtunerc: Client side application that is executed on your PC (linux OS like Ubuntu). This connects DVB/DVR applications

For more information, downloads and source codes see here:
http://code.google.com/p/vtuner

The problem here, unfortunately vtunerd does not work correctly on VU+ boxes, only DMM customers enjoy this great application.

However, I opened a ticket and the developer is interested in to modify code to support VU+ boxes. Since he does not have VU+ box, I tried to help him on testing by sending required log files. But at the moment developer needs a USB tuner logs attached to VU+. Unfortunately I don't have a USB tuner and I cannot help him anymore. Please see the full story here:

http://code.google.c...es/detail?id=13

What I'm asking is the help of VU+ users/developers having a USB tuner working on E2. If you can help on this, just write a message on the above link, then the developer will give required directions.

For sure, especially help of the skilled developers of this forum would fasten this process. Any help would be appreciated !!!

Thanks !!